We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

When does a beneficiary have to commit to taking a property via appropriation?

One beneficiary has the option to appropriate a residential property from an estate (there are two beneficiaries in total) The solicitor is currently trying to get the beneficiary to say that they will commit to appropriating the property before the final valuation of the property (ie: the sale value after probate has been granted) has been decided; however the beneficiary won't commit until that value has been decided.
Which one is right? Can the beneficiary wait, or (as the solicitor is implying) do they have to commit before the final value has been worked out?

Very grateful for your feedback.

Comments

  • its an option ...so why would they commit before having all the required information they need to make their decision?

    they are certainly going to need a valuation and so is the estate at some point if property is to be sold

    is it likely/possible the beneficiary with the option to appropriate the property , may decide not to exercise their option?
  • Yorkshireman99
    Yorkshireman99 Posts: 5,470 Forumite
    lulabel5 wrote: »
    One beneficiary has the option to appropriate a residential property from an estate (there are two beneficiaries in total) The solicitor is currently trying to get the beneficiary to say that they will commit to appropriating the property before the final valuation of the property (ie: the sale value after probate has been granted) has been decided; however the beneficiary won't commit until that value has been decided.
    Which one is right? Can the beneficiary wait, or (as the solicitor is implying) do they have to commit before the final value has been worked out?

    Very grateful for your feedback.
    The solicitor is being unreasonable. A professional valuation by a RICS or similar is needed. Nobody can b expected to give an open ended commitment like this.
  • lulabel5
    lulabel5 Posts: 10 Forumite
    Many thanks to both of you for your replies.

    Probate was granted two weeks ago but HMRC has not agreed the probate value of the property yet, so it is not yet known whether there will be more IHT to pay. The solicitor is saying that it might 'take some months' for HMRC to do this, and is using this delay as a reason for the beneficiary to commit to appropriating (or not) the property now.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    If it were me I would say this is what I will pay NOW whatever the future valuation turns out to be

    Then the solicitor will have to get the the other beneficiary to agree.

    The real issue is as soon as the house is handed over the costs belong to the new beneficial owner not the estate in the mean time the costs of running the house will be shared(unless occupied already.

    Another option is get it on the market.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.