We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

If property transferred to beneficiary is it best to get a RICS to do valuation?

Options
Hi there
If an inherited property is to be transferred to beneficiary is it best to get a RICS to do valuation or estate agents? (as estate agents seem to put in very high valuations)

Comments

  • Yorkshireman99
    Yorkshireman99 Posts: 5,470 Forumite
    lulabel5 wrote: »
    Hi there
    If an inherited property is to be transferred to beneficiary is it best to get a RICS to do valuation or estate agents? (as estate agents seem to put in very high valuations)
    It depends if the beneficiary is going to use it as their main residence in which case there will not be a future CGT issue. I am assuming the estate is below the IHT threshold. Estate agents valuations are notoriously high.
  • lulabel5
    lulabel5 Posts: 10 Forumite
    Hi there
    The valuation for IHT has already been submitted and probate granted - however, the solicitor seems to think that if one of the two beneficiaries has the property transferred to them via appropriation, another valuation will have to be done to work out what the current value of the property is, ie: what proportion of the estate it represents.
    Is it possible to insist that a Chartered surveyor does this rather than an estate agent, as the estate agents seem to want to put in the highest value, even though they freely admit it is unlikely the property will sell for this amount. To be fair to both beneficiaries, is it better to get a chartered urveyor to do this valuation and can the solicitors/executor be compelled to use this method?

    Thanks!
  • Yorkshireman99
    Yorkshireman99 Posts: 5,470 Forumite
    lulabel5 wrote: »
    Hi there
    The valuation for IHT has already been submitted and probate granted - however, the solicitor seems to think that if one of the two beneficiaries has the property transferred to them via appropriation, another valuation will have to be done to work out what the current value of the property is, ie: what proportion of the estate it represents.
    Is it possible to insist that a Chartered surveyor does this rather than an estate agent, as the estate agents seem to want to put in the highest value, even though they freely admit it is unlikely the property will sell for this amount. To be fair to both beneficiaries, is it better to get a chartered urveyor to do this valuation and can the solicitors/executor be compelled to use this method?

    Thanks!
    You have started a second thread on the same question. A RICS valuation is the only fair way. The solicitor will have to get the probate value corrected.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.