We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Right to Buy Scheme... Sigh
Options
Comments
-
I would suggest that mum sells the house for what she can get for it and then moves into something much much smaller in the private rental market. Then if she has another pay problem she can claim benefits. She will need to find something that is small enough for her to pay on her own. If she is renting from you she won't get help with her rent from benefits so it is better for her not to be living in a house you own. It is also better for you. Your mum isn't cut out to be a home owner.0
-
I've already told my mom I probably won't sell the house but rather move in myself when I have a family as I've lived in that house all my life until recent.
Do you mean that you'll move back and live with your mother when you and your new partner have a family?
If so, why don't you and the partner move in with her now?0 -
another thread on why money and family shouldn't mix, with a RTB fail"It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"
G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP0 -
Heres hoping RTB is scrapped when the torries get another term tomorrow.
Why should you get a discount on property when people like me have worked our asses off throughout our lives to get a basic house. Whereas people like you achieve nothing and get given handouts for laziness.0 -
RTB is a Tory policy, why would you think they'd scrap it? They love it!0
-
Red-Squirrel wrote: »RTB is a Tory policy, why would you think they'd scrap it? They love it!
They need to build some more council houses, in order for people to live in, and then buy; but that does not sit well with Tories.
Its Labour that build council houses. Tories use these thousands of pounds to bribe voters to vote for them, where as Labour used tax credits.
They all bribe voters, but we are blind to it.0 -
sevenhills wrote: »They need to build some more council houses, in order for people to live in, and then buy; but that does not sit well with Tories.
Its Labour that build council houses. Tories use these thousands of pounds to bribe voters to vote for them, where as Labour used tax credits.
They all bribe voters, but we are blind to it.
None of them build houses. Builders build houses not politicians. None of them can keep their pledges to build more house unless they do something about training more people in trade skills and since neither of them have pledged to turn any of the 85 dud universities into something for the many who can't get into university there won't be any extra houses in the future.0 -
None of them build houses. Builders build houses not politicians.
What a daft statement.
Margaret Thatchers government built over 40,000 council houses every year; whilst New Labour built an average of 562 council houses per year.
This is not a party political point, because recent Tory government haven't done any better, although I believe Labour run councils build more than Tory run councils.
https://fullfact.org/economy/who-built-more-council-houses-margaret-thatcher-or-new-labour/0 -
sevenhills wrote: »although I believe Labour run councils build more than Tory run councils.
https://fullfact.org/economy/who-built-more-council-houses-margaret-thatcher-or-new-labour/
Of course they do.
Money is never a problem for a Labour member. It grows on trees according to them. And apparently we have an orchid.....0 -
sevenhills wrote: »What a daft statement.
Margaret Thatchers government built over 40,000 council houses every year; whilst New Labour built an average of 562 council houses per year.
This is not a party political point, because recent Tory government haven't done any better, although I believe Labour run councils build more than Tory run councils.
https://fullfact.org/economy/who-built-more-council-houses-margaret-thatcher-or-new-labour/
Please produce the evidence of the number of bricklayers serving in Margaret Thatcher's government. I don't think there were any I think they were all working as politicians. I don't think there are any bricklayers in parliament at the moment either. How many policians who have stood for the election are working as bricklayers, or plumbers, or electricians? They really don't build houses. The most they can do is pay someone else to build them. However at the moment there isn't anyone to pay because someone had a "bright idea" to turn all the technical colleges into universities. So now we have graduates in Film Studies etc and no trade training.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards