PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.2 existing tenants, 1 wants to move out & 1 wants to stay
Options
Comments
-
Just a bit more info. I am now re married and retired.0
-
Tracey011268 wrote: »Hi, my ex wife and I still jointly own my ex marital home. She is living in it on her own. We are tenants in common, what I need to know is, can I sell my half of the property, or can I insist that the house gets sold if she doesn't agree, as I want to go and live my twighlight years abroad.Tracey011268 wrote: »Just a bit more info. I am now re married and retired.
1: start your own thread
2: probably should've sorted this when you divorced
3: Is it still mortgaged?
4: Yes you can force a sale - typical cost is 5-10k.0 -
Sorry, first time on a forum. Didn't know. Yes, I probably should have sorted it out when I divorced but didn't, hence me asking the question now.
Thanks for the information anyway.0 -
If you can find anyone willing to buy your half, and co-own with your ex, then yes - you can sell.
Or simply sell it to your ex.
Failing that, pursuade her to sell and split the proceeds.
And failing that, force a sale though the costs, though this is slow, expensive, and stressful.0 -
Thanks for the feedback. I would be willing to let her stay on and take sole tenancy but she would need a guarantor as she wouldn't be able to afford it on her own. To be honest I just thought she would prefer the three month break but I'll give her both options. I know it would be easier for me to re-rent the whole property by she's a good tenant and I want to try and see if there's another solution first.0
-
A credit check is not an affordability test, so I am not sure why landlords carry out a credit check when they not providing credit (rent paid in advance not arrears).
So personally I think the checks are excessive even tho I know its common in the renting sector.
I would agree to the cooling off period, and do a affordability check (bank statements, proof of income). If you are awkward you risk looking for 2 tenants instead of 1.
a good credit rating is generally an indication someone is a good person and pays there bills on time.
With current tenant protections in place a landlord would be an idiot not to do a credit check, someone with ccjs coming out of there ears are a far bigger risk0 -
I've had a good read of http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=67759913&postcount=4 but just want to check my understanding is correct.
If at the end of the fixed term tenant 1 wants to stay they can serve no notice and the day after the fixed term ends they roll onto a periodic tenancy?
If tenant 2 wants to leave they just need to be out on the last day of the fixed term and again need to serve no notice?
If I want to ensure they both leave on the last day of the fixed term I would need to serve a 6a form giving them 2 months notice?0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.8K Spending & Discounts
- 235.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 248K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards