We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Investing £32,000

My £32,000 bond is about to mature in November 2007 and i was hoping for some advice on where to put it. I had a woolwich fixed bond account for it up till now but with all the intrest hikes i have lost out big time.

I have used up my mini isa allowence and i have no debts to pay off the max i can tie it up for is prob 6mths..

I dont want any risk but i would like to earn some good intrest though i am a tax payer.

I have an ing account already the web based one paying AER 5.75% at the moment and was thinking of sticking it in there .

Can anyone come up with any better ideas?

Many thanx in advance
Happiness is not having what you want...but wanting what you have!!!
«13

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,283 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You say you want to invest but you only mention savings options. Which is to be; invest or save?
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • chesky369
    chesky369 Posts: 2,590 Forumite
    Don't add it to any existing savings account, since it's very near the £35k guaranteed figure. What about maxi ISAs? Or ICEsave savings account? ING is rubbish anyway.
  • polomint_2
    polomint_2 Posts: 372 Forumite
    chesky369 wrote: »
    Don't add it to any existing savings account, since it's very near the £35k guaranteed figure. What about maxi ISAs? Or ICEsave savings account? ING is rubbish anyway.

    Can you explain why you say ing is rubbish please?

    Ill have a look at ICEsave. £35,000 guarenteed figure? Meaning garunteed by the government?

    :confused:
    Happiness is not having what you want...but wanting what you have!!!
  • chesky369
    chesky369 Posts: 2,590 Forumite
    ING has treated its customers appallingly over the past couple of years - not only by NOT putting up its interest rates when the bank rate has been increased (on at least two occasions, maybe more) - but also, adding insult to injury, sending out smug e-mails, telling them how lucky they are to be saving with them. It's been many a long month since ING featured in any 'best buy' list of accounts.
  • chesky369
    chesky369 Posts: 2,590 Forumite
    PS £35k guaranteed by the FSA; it was yesterday's front'page news.
  • polomint_2
    polomint_2 Posts: 372 Forumite
    chesky369 wrote: »
    PS £35k guaranteed by the FSA; it was yesterday's front'page news.

    I only read the paper when i am at work..:rotfl: and today and yesterday are my days off.

    Yep i can see what you are saying RE:ing i have only a couple of hundred in there at the moment so not making to much of a diffrence to my savings plan.
    Happiness is not having what you want...but wanting what you have!!!
  • isofa
    isofa Posts: 6,091 Forumite
    Yep, but unless you are a very jittery type, who dare not go outside in case of being hit by a bus, I'm sure you'll be ok going over the 35K limit like most people with a rational mind. Remember no bank/building society for personal savers has collapsed for 117 years. I'd rather stash my cash where the best rates apply, and some accounts have tired interest levels, so pay a little more interest when the balance figure increases.
  • chesky369
    chesky369 Posts: 2,590 Forumite
    But if everyone kept their ears and eyes open and kept each individual savings account to the £35k limit, then there'd be less need for panic like the northern rock debacle. If all their savers had KNOWN their money was safe, they wouldn't have thought it necessary to queue for hours to get it out.
  • isofa
    isofa Posts: 6,091 Forumite
    Quite, but their savings were safe, there was very little doubt of that. The media frenzy caused panic and the run on the bank, which made the situation worse, this has been covered in great detail on the NR threads.

    Surely it would be better for the FSA to have raised the "protection" limit to 100K, as many of us thought they would.

    OK for an example, say a well established bank offered 6.1% interest for £1 to 40K, but 7% if you invested 41K to 100K and you had a fair bit of cash to put away (say 50K+), are you saying you wouldn't go for the higher rate because of the minuscule risk they might collapse?

    Each to their own I guess, but I think people are now in a bizarre panic mindset. Money is 99% safe in banks/BS, and nothing has happened to disprove this.
  • polomint_2
    polomint_2 Posts: 372 Forumite
    shouldnt the above be on another thread and not mine asking for help????:confused::confused::confused:
    Happiness is not having what you want...but wanting what you have!!!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.