We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
phone contract
jimhardy
Posts: 3 Newbie
in Phones & TV
My contract with my phone company only exists in the form of a telephone conversation. How much legal validity does this have and should I have to pay £10 to get a copy of the recording?
0
Comments
-
It has exactly the same validity as a written contract. Yes, you should.
By using the service you will anyway have accepted the termsNo free lunch, and no free laptop
0 -
You are fully bound by their published contract for service, they are not required to send you a copy as it will be available on their website, so trying to assert it is 'verbal' doesn't work - your acceptance of the terms is deemed confirmed by you paying for the service.0
-
I'm not convinced. I'm not trying to wriggle out of anything, but if I ordered a service over the phone I don't see how I can be bound by anything that may be published elsewhere - only by what was said in that conversation. I accept that I am paying for the service but only on the basis of what I was told on the phone. Incidentally the company website is not at all clear about terms and conditions, especially about early termination.0
-
Which network is it?
It would be impossible for them to recite all the terms and conditions over the phone. Most run for pages and pages and pages and you'd fall asleep listening to them! It's not realistic to do that.
To answer your other question, yes £10 is the standard fee companies charge to process a SAR.0 -
-
There is already case law that supports the supplier, so the onus would be on you to attempt to prove the opposite, and that could be expensive as you would be paying for it all.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards