We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Factor fees liability for house move

Hi,

I'm due to move house Friday 9th June but yesterday my solicitor identified that there is a potential outstanding liability for the factoring fees noted on the title deeds of the house I intend on buying.

She recommends not concluding until the current owners arrange something and my solicitor receives a discharge letter confirming that thier liability won't be my responsibility. I'm prepared to pay my share when I move in.

Is anyone able to confirm if this is common? Is it likely to be resolved in a week as time is ticking.... Surely they can't pursue me for a liability for when I wasn't even living there?

I'm in Scotland if that helps.

Thanks in advance for any advice.

Kevin.

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Graykev wrote: »
    Is anyone able to confirm if this is common?

    Yes.
    Is it likely to be resolved in a week

    Yes.
    Surely they can't pursue me for a liability for when I wasn't even living there?

    Yes they can, that's the point of registering the notice on the title. Your solicitor's advice sounds correct, so go along with what they recommend.
    I'm in Scotland

    Yes, nobody else would be talking about "factors" :)
  • OK, thanks for the reassurance. I have no doubt my solicitor is on the ball with this. My main concern was this causing delays pushing back moving day.

    Will the current owners be expected to pay the balance? Or is it more likely they will dismiss it on the basis they haven't paid up to now and the new owners (me) will pay?
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Graykev wrote: »
    Will the current owners be expected to pay the balance? Or is it more likely they will dismiss it on the basis they haven't paid up to now and the new owners (me) will pay?
    Sellers always pay all sums due up to the date of sale, it's not something anybody negotiates about.
  • saajan_12
    saajan_12 Posts: 5,767 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Not sure if this is how it works in Scotland, but to speed things along, could you agree to reduce the purchase price by the outstanding liability and then you pay it?
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    saajan_12 wrote: »
    Not sure if this is how it works in Scotland, but to speed things along, could you agree to reduce the purchase price by the outstanding liability and then you pay it?
    The only real stumbling blocks might be (a) if there is a dispute about whether the sums are actually due (e.g. because they've been wrongly charged or have already been paid), or (b) the seller doesn't have enough equity to cover the cost at settlement. Reducing the price won't solve either of these.
  • Graykev
    Graykev Posts: 3 Newbie
    The seller will have enough equity to cover them but I just hope they do. I'm assuming they haven't been paying it for a reason so of they maintain the same principles they may refuse now.

    Bur surely they wouldn't allow this to ultimately prevent them selling their home. It'll just crop up again and again on the future of they don't pay now.

    I just want things concluded!!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.