We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PCN Admin Centre Indigo - A Strange One

bluetoffee1878
Posts: 308 Forumite

Helping yet another friend.
He is RK but other half is main driver.
NTK received in post from PCN Admin Centre Indigo. Creditor is Indigo Park Services Ltd.
It seems a windscreen ticket was issued on a car in London Reg number on the NTK is his car but the vehicle is identified on the NTK as a Mercedes. His car is not a Merc.
Furthermore it has never been parked in London.
The invoice is for £124 so higher than the BPA maximum.
My initial thought is to do a subject access request to get any and all 'evidence'
Or should he just go for the standard BPA template appeal
Thoughts anybody
Thanks
BT
He is RK but other half is main driver.
NTK received in post from PCN Admin Centre Indigo. Creditor is Indigo Park Services Ltd.
It seems a windscreen ticket was issued on a car in London Reg number on the NTK is his car but the vehicle is identified on the NTK as a Mercedes. His car is not a Merc.
Furthermore it has never been parked in London.
The invoice is for £124 so higher than the BPA maximum.
My initial thought is to do a subject access request to get any and all 'evidence'
Or should he just go for the standard BPA template appeal
Thoughts anybody
Thanks
BT
0
Comments
-
Why not take a pic of the car showing the VRM and send it back to Indigo telling them to check their pics before he gets the DVLA to do it.
Add that they have no "reasonable cause" to have the personal details and they should stop processing them immediately.
In 14 days send a letter of complain to the DVLA even if Indigo reply as I'm sure their reply will be "lost"This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Yes IamEmanresu good idea, I'll suggest that to him.
SAR sent requesting further info (not holding my breath)
Also interestingly I noticed on the NTK that to pay it, cheques to be made out to ZZPS Ltd. Never seen one like this before where they appear to have gone straight to debt collection stage with added costs. I don't yet know what the original 'charge' was.
Bit naughty that.0 -
indigo loose that many cases , they try to sidestep POPLa by using PCS/zzps , it is quite the norm to hear of this happening , they will swear that a NTK was sent out (zzps is follow up) , however the BPA will back them up by saying recorded delivery is not in the BPA code of practice , and if they say they sent one ,,, they did!Save a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
Quick update:
No response whatsoever to the SAR (wasn't expecting anything)
Standard appeal / challenge sent with a few pertinent points as the vehicle / driver / RK have never visited or parked at the site in question.
Got the following response:
Thank you for your recent email.
We have now placed the account on hold and queried this matter with our client.
As soon as we receive a response, we shall contact you accordingly.
Thank you,
So to my understanding they have not followed the BPA COP as they have not provided a POPLA code.0 -
they dont have to provide a popla code unless they reject the appeal, which they have not done , yet
you are now in limbo awaiting their actual decision0 -
Thanks Redx - had not thought of it like that0
-
its the same as when a court case is "stayed"
there is no decision
neither side has won
both sides are at an impasse
its now up to INDIGO to decide if they move it on or not, they have up to 6 years to decide their next move, but the longer they wait the less likely that it will continue
you may never hear about it again !!
this means that people are left dangling and worrying , like yourself, these people dont care that they have that effect on other human beings who prefer closure0 -
No response whatsoever to the SAR (wasn't expecting anything)
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/principle-6-rights/subject-access-request/Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards