We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

What happens next?

13»

Comments

  • Yorkshireman99
    Yorkshireman99 Posts: 5,470 Forumite
    Savvy_Sue wrote: »
    :-) yes I know that, and when there are only two beneficiaries it's probably not unreasonable to distribute the estate before the SNs are placed, it's just (I thought) highly unusual for solicitors to do it that way round!
    It is almost unheard of for solicitors to do this as they are keen to cover their own position and that is not unreasonable. In this case it seems the OP has agreed to take the risk in the interest of keeping the emply house secret though I am not sure the average burgler reads the Gazette notices!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.