Vehicle Control / BW Legal Court Case

Woo-Ha

Thanks again all,

After reading the posts again I think I understand better the requirements of POFA relating to the NTK and liability. The reason i didn't want to use this as the primary point was that i thought the signage issue was stronger. To some extent this is still the case however I have amended the defence to include keeper liability as i think there is a weakness under the following requriements of POFA that the NTK must:

(e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—
(i)to pay the unpaid parking charges; or
(ii)if the keeper was not the driver of the vehicle, to notify the creditor of the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and to pass the notice on to the driver;
(f)warn the keeper that if, at the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to keeper is given—

I have photos of the NTK relevant to this claim for review. Unfortunately as a newbie i can't seem to post a link. How do i get around this?

It is also nearly time for me to submit the defence. At this stage do i need to include evidence such as photos and a copy of the NTK or will the basic arguments suffice.

Thanks again,

Woo-Ha

Copy of NTK

hxxps://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxMkWbgklLSialdJVy1XNldBYWM?usp=sharing

Lamilad

It is also nearly time for me to submit the defence. At this stage do i need to include evidence such as photos and a copy of the NTK or will the basic arguments suffice.

Defence is bullet points of everything you dispute about the claim and anything else the court should know such as woeful PoC, non compliance with CPRs/ pre action protocols etc

You don't include any evidence or exhibits at this stage. That comes with your WS nearer to the hearing date.