We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

NPS letter before action

13»

Comments

  • busby3000
    busby3000 Posts: 34 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Thank you Coupon-Mad and Loadsofchildren for your replies. All useful.

    Sorry, perhaps I didn't make it clear - there was just a text to confirm, no email. I don't think it was read, just the notification that it had been sent.

    The copy of the email conversation between NPS & Whoosh (confirming which car park was paid for) was on the back of the latest letter from NPS.

    There were 2 windscreen tickets allegedly issued for consecutive days according to the NTKs.

    Ticket 1 - issued 20/11/15, NTK 23/12/15, no windscreen ticket
    Ticket 2 - issued 21/11/15, NTK 4/2/16, windscreen ticket

    The photos they took do not show a windscreen ticket for the 1st day, although it is referred to in the NTK. Because of this, I thought it was just the one ticket until they started asking for £200

    Yes - I only started googling on here after admitting who the driver was :( I should perhaps say it was my daughter who was driving, not me! I'd learnt a lot more about the process by the time I got my own ticket last year, and got some good advice from Coupon-Mad on how to reply.
  • Did you park there on both days or do you think they have made a mistake?

    Presumably the "Whoosh defence" doesn't apply to both. You need to work out what happened on the other day. 2 PCNs perhaps weakens the reasonable endeavours/system not fit for purpose defence.

    Have you worked out which one is which?

    Thanks for clarifying re the email/text. So would the text have said the carpark or just "thanks for paying £x for your parking" or something generic like that?
    Although a practising Solicitor, my posts here are NOT legal advice, but are personal opinion based on limited facts provided anonymously by forum users. I accept no liability for the accuracy of any such posts and users are advised that, if they wish to obtain formal legal advice specific to their case, they must seek instruct and pay a solicitor.
  • busby3000
    busby3000 Posts: 34 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    I don't know what the text would have said. Unfortunately they don't have a phone number. I could always pay to park somewhere with them and see I guess!!

    Yes, she parked both days. she paid on the 19th at 6.30 and tickets issued the 21st and 22nd so for 2 consecutive days.

    Yes I know which is which for the 1 windscreen ticket issued, the 2 NTKs and the pics they took
  • So on one occasion you say it was paid for but there was a mistake, what about the second occasion? I'm confused!


    Does the email correspondence between Whoosh and the PPC help you see where the mistake was made/what it was? Eg does it give the code for each carpark, and you made an error in one digit? If there was one wrong digit this points to it being your error. If the codes are completely different for each car park this indicates that it is a system error. If you haven't got this information, either write yourself to Whoosh and ask them these questions or ask the PPC. If you decide the latter, I wouldn't engage with them now, wait and see if they are going to take this further.
    Although a practising Solicitor, my posts here are NOT legal advice, but are personal opinion based on limited facts provided anonymously by forum users. I accept no liability for the accuracy of any such posts and users are advised that, if they wish to obtain formal legal advice specific to their case, they must seek instruct and pay a solicitor.
  • busby3000
    busby3000 Posts: 34 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    edited 15 May 2017 at 1:35PM
    Sorry if I'm not being clear...she arrived at the car park 6.30pm on the 19th and paid till the 21st. The NTKs were issued on the 20th & 21st. One windscreen ticket was found on return to the car dated 21st.

    The email from Whoosh to NPS just gives the name of the car park paid for (Wilson Patten Street), along with the reg number of the car, date & time. There is no code

    The only way I could contact them, which I did twice via there online contact us form - no phone number. I sent this but they did not reply:

    "Sent to Whoosh 2/2/2016

    Hi, I paid by phone to park in Newcastle (NPS) on 19 November 2015 6.35pm (as detailed on my phone bill) to Tel no. 08444 480418. I was debited by yourselves on 21 November for£18.20 (as detailed on my bank statement) I received a ticket for non payment and unfortunately had deleted the SMS. Is there any way you can verify that I have paid?

    Many thanks"

    I have just looked at the Whoosh website and found the code for Wilson Patten St - 10070. Unfortunately they do not seem to be managing the Scottish Life Car park in Newcastle so there is no code. However I'm sure I've seen another thread on here re someone who is also having problems for the same car park so will google.

    I am tempted also to suggest to NPS that with the info they have finally managed to get from Whoosh, that along with their photographic evidence showing the the car was actually parked in Newcastle, they could get their money from them. They could obviously have got this info back in 2015 if it was so easy for them to communicate with Whoosh

    I don't know if this is also relevant - I just found on another thread that the machines do not work between 6pm and 8am when it is free to park. Which is why she had to pay via Whoosh, not because the machine was broken.

    I have also checked the NPS photographic evidence for the 2 tickets issued. There is a pic of the meter and a pic of the T&C notice. No mention of not being able to pay 6pm-8am and no pic of any pay by Whoosh details which would have shown the code (there would have course have been one, they just didn't take a pic of it). I also love how they have taken a pic of the front windscreen on one of the days with no sticker ticket on it!
  • So my understanding is:


    Driver paid for parking in Wilson Patten St (code 10070), but actually parked in Scottish Life Car Park (code unknown). The reason for the payment going against the other car park is unknown. You are currently assuming driver error but don't know this.


    Driver had paid for 2 days parking, not realising it had gone to the wrong car park. So then got 2 tickets, one on each day.


    I think it's worth finding out the code for the SL Car park. If it's completely different then you have a stronger argument of system error as opposed to driver error.


    i also think you need to find out one way or another what info the text would have given (eg name of car park).


    You also need to have a look at the signage in that car park. How small was the bit of the sign that said to pay Whoosh if machine out of operation? Was it almost impossible for the driver to see the code correctly and does that explain why the mistake was made? I don't think it matters that the machine doesn't work during certain hours of free parking, as long as there is an alternative method of payment.


    If this is simple driver error, there will be sympathy for the driver, but if the signs are contractual then the court is likely to find in the PPC's favour. That leaves your two arguments of "reasonable endeavours" and the Whoosh system was unfit for purpose - and these two could go either way.


    On the 2 tickets issue you could argue that this is the same parking event and there should only be 1 ticket. If it's innocent driver error on the code, if the court feels a bit sorry for the driver and their innocent mistake, I think the court will be better disposed towards the Defendant.


    Is it the driver being pursued here or the RK?


    Not sure what you mean by "Unfortunately they do not seem to be managing the Scottish Life Car park" and whether this is significant.... do you mean Whoosh or NCP?
    Although a practising Solicitor, my posts here are NOT legal advice, but are personal opinion based on limited facts provided anonymously by forum users. I accept no liability for the accuracy of any such posts and users are advised that, if they wish to obtain formal legal advice specific to their case, they must seek instruct and pay a solicitor.
  • busby3000
    busby3000 Posts: 34 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Thanks for that. Yes, I am trying to find the code for the car park. I have found one online - a current one, which is totally different to the Wilson Patton one. However although NPS still seem to be managing it, you can't pay via Whoosh as it is not showing up on their website, so I guess a different company is managing online payments now.

    I don't know about the signage. As I said, the pics they took showed the machine and the Pay & Display sign. There would have been another with details of payment to Whoosh, but not shown.

    I will try to find out what text confirmations from Whoosh show

    I wondered about the one event thing.

    Yes the driver is the RK. We have admitted to this.
  • busby3000 wrote: »
    However although NPS still seem to be managing it, you can't pay via Whoosh as it is not showing up on their website, so I guess a different company is managing online payments now.

    That's interesting. If this hots up, you can point that out and say it must have been because there were so many errors with the system....
    Although a practising Solicitor, my posts here are NOT legal advice, but are personal opinion based on limited facts provided anonymously by forum users. I accept no liability for the accuracy of any such posts and users are advised that, if they wish to obtain formal legal advice specific to their case, they must seek instruct and pay a solicitor.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,365 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    If you are local to that area have a word with the Valley Junction restaurant close by. They've gone a couple of rounds with NPS in the local courts so might have an insight on that car park for you.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • busby3000
    busby3000 Posts: 34 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    My other daughter is at Newcastle Uni. I'll try to get her to check out the car park. Now that Whoosh have (conveniently) given me Whoosh contact emails this might help, rather than filling in an online contact form.

    I could also get her to ask at the Valley Junction restaurant
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.