We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Where should I start?

2»

Comments

  • DireEmblem
    DireEmblem Posts: 930 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 April 2017 at 12:40PM
    Thanks for the comments - for clarification on risk, a S&S ISA is not going to be more than 25% of my regular savings, hence risk appetite. Given the other 75% is effectively in cash equivalent then yes I may rethink holding a bond fund, but I think I do have diversity here. 40% emerging markets, 20% UK and the other 40% in worldwide securities is not a bad mix imo. Yes funds and makeup are still to be decided, and I plan to spend the next month in doing this, building up a 5-10-15 year plan.

    I will check out ftse 250 trackers or uk smaller companies, that does sound like a good idea, to ignore the ftse 100
  • AndyT678
    AndyT678 Posts: 757 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    DireEmblem wrote: »
    40% emerging markets, 20% UK and the other 40% in worldwide securities is not a bad mix imo.

    I think you might be one of a very small minority who hold that opinion...

    The first time I went to India I was amazed at the vibrancy and massive potential that seemed to be on offer there. Then I realised that whilst that was a revelation for me, millions of other people had already recognised it and priced it in to the valuations of all the businesses operating there anyway.
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 18,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I think I'd prefer to have my risk balanced with higher equities and lower cash but more diversified than that.


    I do have quite high EM exposure but still only 15-20%
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    greenglide wrote: »
    The FTSE250 is the 101th to the 350th companies in the index as you say.

    The FTSE350 is the 1st to 350th - essentially the FTSE100 + the FTSE250.

    The FTSE250 is really, really badly named!

    Thanks, I didnt realise that i thought it was 101 to 460.

    FTSE250 would suit the OP then.
  • bigadaj
    bigadaj Posts: 11,531 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    When you describe the ftse100 as that high risk index, dominated by commodities, financials and emerging market exposure it looks quite attractive in the longer term.

    Unfortunately the reality is that it has performed terribly for long periods of time, maybe that's a warning that higher risk doesn't always lead to higher returns.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.