We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Negligen Solicitor?
Options

nobby36
Posts: 1 Newbie

Hi. I wonder if you could give me some advice. I understand the limits on these forums.
I have had a house built to sell, to raise some extra money for our retirement.
The house was sold at a reduced price as I wanted to take advantage of tax relief on the investment profits.This was to complete before the new tax year.
Contracts had been exchanged and a completion date set for 31 March. On this date, I was advised (only after asking what was going on because nobody had bothered to tell me) that there was a problem.
It seems that my buyer's solicitor has discovered that there is a title problem, due to part of the garage on the buyers land actually sitting on someone else's land.
Our house is an empty new build. There are two others in the chain. On the completion, BOTH parties were ready to move and packed up. They are livid, to say the least.
Our problem is, that we have now lost our last years tax relief, and are now paying other things (council tax, gas, electric, specialist empty property insurance, and loan interest, as well.
If the facts are as above (obviously I will have to prove things) will this be a case of negligence by the solicitor and, will they be liable for compensating all our losses?
I trust you can give me some guidance, if not confirmation without liability for your advice. Best regards.
I have had a house built to sell, to raise some extra money for our retirement.
The house was sold at a reduced price as I wanted to take advantage of tax relief on the investment profits.This was to complete before the new tax year.
Contracts had been exchanged and a completion date set for 31 March. On this date, I was advised (only after asking what was going on because nobody had bothered to tell me) that there was a problem.
It seems that my buyer's solicitor has discovered that there is a title problem, due to part of the garage on the buyers land actually sitting on someone else's land.
Our house is an empty new build. There are two others in the chain. On the completion, BOTH parties were ready to move and packed up. They are livid, to say the least.
Our problem is, that we have now lost our last years tax relief, and are now paying other things (council tax, gas, electric, specialist empty property insurance, and loan interest, as well.
If the facts are as above (obviously I will have to prove things) will this be a case of negligence by the solicitor and, will they be liable for compensating all our losses?
I trust you can give me some guidance, if not confirmation without liability for your advice. Best regards.
0
Comments
-
Not sure which solicitor you are alleging has been negligent? If it is your own then no.
The other solicitors don't act for you so wouldn't directly be responsible for your losses.
If anything your action would be against your buyer and fed down the chain (and they would pursue their solicitors if they have been negligent).0 -
I don't really understand your question but are you saying that you built a new house with a garage that is partly on land belonging to someone else? If this is the case then this is nothing really to do with the solicitors it is down to the person who built something that isn't entirely on their land.0
-
If you have exchanged then failure to complete is a serious matter. If your buyer failed to complete then they can be sued for all costs you incurred caused by them not completing on the contract date.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0
-
...If the facts are as above (obviously I will have to prove things) will this be a case of negligence by the solicitor and, will they be liable for compensating all our losses?..
.
When did you instruct this solicitor? What instructions did you give them?
I'd have thought that if anyone is negligent, it would be whoever was responsible for building this property.0 -
I don't think the issue is with the OPs property, but their buyer's which has delayed their sale and impacted the chain0
-
Don't hold your breath on this one.Eat vegetables and fear no creditors, rather than eat duck and hide.0
-
If part of the garage is on land belonging to someone else they can't sell them that part of the garage because they don't own the land that it is on. If the garage is part of the sale this means that they can't complete the sale because they are trying to sell something that doesn't belong to them. The person who is negligent is the person who built a property that isn't all on their land and then tried to sell it as if it was. Until the problem with the land that doesn't belong to the seller is sorted out the buyer can't complete because he isn't buying what is specified in the contract.0
-
If completion was meant to be over three weeks ago, surely by now you've had a chance to get advice from your solicitor about what your remedies are? It's not obvious from what you say that any of the solicitors have been negligent, and assuming you don't think your own solicitor has been negligent (can't see why they would be), then anybody else's solicitor's negligence is irrelevant to you - they don't owe you a duty of care.
If your buyer can't complete the purchase from you, then your remedies are under the contract between you and your buyer e.g. forfeiting the deposit they've paid and possibly damages on top of that. Whether or not they can recover those costs from their solicitor (or, in turn, their buyer's buyer can sue their solicitor) isn't your problem.0 -
Is the contract date the date of sale for tax purposes?No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
-
Is the contract date the date of sale for tax purposes?
OP. It's simple:
* you had a contract with your buyer.
* your buyer breached that contract by failing to Complete on the contractually agreed date (the reason why is irrelevant).
* you claim ALL your consequential losses off your buyer.
Whether he in turn can claim off his solicitor is not your concern.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards