We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Investment watchlist, thoughts?

ian-d
ian-d Posts: 371 Forumite
edited 14 April 2017 at 1:11PM in Savings & investments
I'm beginning my venture into the world of investments for long term gains (hopefully). Markets might be toppy at the moment, so intention is to add money slowly over the course of this year (all within ISA wrapper). I'm looking at these index funds and bonds so far; appreciate that some will overlap. Thoughts appreciated and examples of your own portfolio gratefully received:

BlackRock Emerging Markets Equity Tracker
BlackRock Pacific ex Japan Equity Tracker
CF Woodford Equity
Fidelity Moneybuilder
HSBC FTSE 250 Index
Legal & General International Index Trust
Legal & General UK 100 Index Trus
Vanguard LifeStrategy 100% Equity
Vanguard LifeStrategy 40% Equity
Vanguard LifeStrategy 60% Equity

Intention is a balance of UK indexes/bonds, US indexes/bonds and Global indexes.

Vanguard added to watch list solely because of their low fees; I question whether their spread negates some of the others? Similarly with the UK indexes covered by a few here.

Comments

  • ColdIron
    ColdIron Posts: 9,960 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    Hard to say without proportions but what is your justification for 1) mixing the generalist funds like Vanguard with more specialist funds and 2) such a wide range of LifeStrategy allocations. Seems confused to me
  • jamei305
    jamei305 Posts: 635 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Why the two income funds? Do you need an income or do you like the particular mix of shares they hold for some reason?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,029 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    No weightings means it is impossible to consider structure but the choice of funds seems really strange. Three different multi-asset funds with near identical underlying assets makes no sense. The use of a FTSE100 tracker would need some justification as its such an awful index.

    You then have to ask why are you using trackers as you do not appear to believe in the principle of passive investing. You are making significant management decisions. So, what makes you more qualified and capable of beating professional fund managers?

    It would help to know the amounts as well as you could be significantly over-complicating this.

    If I saw one of my advisers putting together that fund selection I would consider it poor advice and take appropriate action.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,663 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I hope this is just a shortlist from which you will pick 1-4 funds in which to actually invest. Seems to me your choices are:

    - Vanguard Lifestrategy OR some combination of L&G International + Fidelity Moneybuilder Income
    - Leave it at that OR add come CF Woodford OR some combination of FTSE100/FTSE250 tracker
    - Leave it at that OR add some combination of the Japan / EM funds.
  • ian-d
    ian-d Posts: 371 Forumite
    Sorry for the "income" confusion, mistaken product, only interested in accumulation.

    As mentioned, there is overlap; these are products I've highlighted for consideration, obviously no point investing in duplicates, though I may need some assistance in understanding which are (I'll research too). I will cherry pick between them and others.

    In terms of money; either going to utilise the LISA so max £4k per year; or a proportion of my Cash ISA, so in the region of £25-50k, over a period of time to spread risk on ups and downs.

    Do Vanguard products typically cover all basis, or would a more sensible approach be to target an individual bond fund, individual index fund etc? Is there any point overlapping L&G and HSBC FTSE products, maybe focus on 250 rather than the 100?

    Thoughts/views appreciated.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,029 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    As mentioned, there is overlap; these are products I've highlighted for consideration,

    In which case, if you have done your research correctly, you would only have one VLS being suitable for you. Not three
    In terms of money; either going to utilise the LISA so max £4k per year; or a proportion of my Cash ISA, so in the region of £25-50k, over a period of time to spread risk on ups and downs.

    In which case, one multi-asset fund will do the job fine. Dont over complicate it and try and build a bespoke portfolio of single sector funds on such a small amount.

    For example, if your model allocation for Japanese equity was 3% then 3% of £25,000 is just £750.
    Do Vanguard products typically cover all basis, or would a more sensible approach be to target an individual bond fund, individual index fund etc?

    They are not products, they are funds. The VLS funds cover a selection of areas but are not as widespread as others. The more cautious investors may prefer L&GMI instead
    Is there any point overlapping L&G and HSBC FTSE products, maybe focus on 250 rather than the 100?
    I would forget about trying to build a bespoke portfolio of single sector funds at this stage. To get to a position where you are likely to beat a multi-asset fund will take some learning and understanding. Something you dont have yet but something you can get over time.

    It isnt a case of picking a random percentage and putting into a random passive fund. That is poor quality investing. It is about having a structure and process using allocations that match economic data, actuarial assumptions and risk profiles and then picking funds that you feel offer best options with the end result being the plan to beat the multi-asset fund you could have used instead that does all that for you.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • ian-d
    ian-d Posts: 371 Forumite
    Thank you dunstonh for the sound advise, when you put it that way, 3% of not very much is just a waste of time, even if the % increases are relevant regardless.

    Would your view change if it was a large sum of money, say £25k? Reason being that I have that invested with Lloyds in their e-investment ISA (past contributions, not this year) but I'm getting told their fund (with Scottish Widow) is a poor performer...it hasn't started yet, waiting for the ISA money to transfer in.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,029 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Would your view change if it was a large sum of money, say £25k?

    Not really. Bespoke portfolios tend to be more sensible at the 100k range.

    You can start looking to adjust allocations if you feel the multi-asset fund is lacking in an area earlier than that. Maybe 25k onwards. However, you must always remember that any adjustments you make are management decisions and you need to decide if you have the knowledge and understanding at that stage to make the right management decisions.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • ian-d
    ian-d Posts: 371 Forumite
    dunstonh wrote: »
    However, you must always remember that any adjustments you make are management decisions

    But my missus is hopeless with money :D:D:D
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.