We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Compensatio

Hi i was going to change energy supliers but decided not to it was done in the contacted them they said that edf bad taken over my gas supply which i was livid about as it had been canceled snd they responded saying it had been canceled so now my suplier has got to treat me as s new costumer and get my scount bk of edf they have been in touc h after i complained to them snd the resulution compensation which i asked for because of the isue it is on thursday they are phoneing me how much do you think is a adaquate amound of compensation can i espect of them ifs been a night mare

Comments

  • System
    System Posts: 178,185 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Blackey91 wrote: »
    Hi i was going to change energy supliers but decided not to it was done in the contacted them they said that edf bad taken over my gas supply which i was livid about as it had been canceled snd they responded saying it had been canceled so now my suplier has got to treat me as s new costumer and get my scount bk of edf they have been in touc h after i complained to them snd the resulution compensation which i asked for because of the isue it is on thursday they are phoneing me how much do you think is a adaquate amound of compensation can i espect of them ifs been a night mare

    With 17 day switching, which includes the 14 day cooling off period, it is likely that if you decide to cancel a transfer that it will not stop the transfer going through. The transfer has then to be reversed. You may be livid but I do not believe that you are entitled to any compensation as you will not lose out financially. When we get one day Energy transfers, then all cancelled switches will have to be reversed as the 'cooling off' period will take place after the transfer.
  • Robin9
    Robin9 Posts: 12,350 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Blackey 91 - as it was you who decided not to proceed causing the suppliers a lot of time and trouble should you be paying the suppliers compensation?

    PS Odds on you wont get a phone call on Thursday.
    Never pay on an estimated bill. Always read and understand your bill
  • PaschalFun
    PaschalFun Posts: 241 Forumite
    Blackey91 wrote: »
    Hi i was going to change energy supliers but decided not to it was done in the contacted them they said that edf bad taken over my gas supply which i was livid about as it had been canceled snd they responded saying it had been canceled so now my suplier has got to treat me as s new costumer and get my scount bk of edf they have been in touc h after i complained to them snd the resulution compensation which i asked for because of the isue it is on thursday they are phoneing me how much do you think is a adaquate amound of compensation can i espect of them ifs been a night mare

    If I understand you correctly, you were going to switch energy supplier
    You even got to the stage of applying
    But then you changed your mind

    Did you stop the switch within the 14 day cooling off period?

    If not, the supplier has done nothing wrong. All you can do is apply to switch again if you no longer wish to be supplied by that new supplier.

    If you did, then the switch should not have gone ahead. If it has, you should complain. You can contact either supplier to do this (the old one you want to reamin with or the new one that took over the supply) - I suggest the old one as they will be keen not to lose a customer.

    Tell them what has happened and explain you wish them to invoke the Erroneous Transfer Customer Charter

    If this goes ahead (and it should do without good reason not to) then you will be treated as never having left the old supplier.
    You will be entitled to no compenstaion as you will be put in the same position you would have been in had the ET not occurred, so you are not adversely affected in any way.

    More info here:
    https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/energy/energy-supply/problems-with-your-energy-supply/youve-been-switched-to-a-new-energy-supplier-without-your-agreement/
  • System
    System Posts: 178,185 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    PaschalFun wrote: »
    If I understand you correctly, you were going to switch energy supplier
    You even got to the stage of applying
    But then you changed your mind

    Did you stop the switch within the 14 day cooling off period?

    If not, the supplier has done nothing wrong. All you can do is apply to switch again if you no longer wish to be supplied by that new supplier.

    If you did, then the switch should not have gone ahead. If it has, you should complain. You can contact either supplier to do this (the old one you want to reamin with or the new one that took over the supply) - I suggest the old one as they will be keen not to lose a customer.

    Tell them what has happened and explain you wish them to invoke the Erroneous Transfer Customer Charter

    If this goes ahead (and it should do without good reason not to) then you will be treated as never having left the old supplier.
    You will be entitled to no compenstaion as you will be put in the same position you would have been in had the ET not occurred, so you are not adversely affected in any way.

    More info here:
    https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/energy/energy-supply/problems-with-your-energy-supply/youve-been-switched-to-a-new-energy-supplier-without-your-agreement/

    Take care: customer cancelled switches are not treated as Errononeous Transfers of Supply. (Source: Ofgem)

    Quote: Cancellations under cooling off are distinct from Erroneous Transfers (ETs). Cancellation under cooling off requires a customer who has entered a contract to make a conscious decision to terminate that contract in a manner that is compatible with the requirements of the Consumer Contracts Regulations. An ET generally arises when a customer notices that they have been switched to another supplier4 without their authority. Unquote
  • wavelets
    wavelets Posts: 1,164 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 11 April 2017 at 7:27PM
    Hengus wrote: »
    Take care: customer cancelled switches are not treated as Errononeous Transfers of Supply. (Source: Ofgem)

    Quote: Cancellations under cooling off are distinct from Erroneous Transfers (ETs). Cancellation under cooling off requires a customer who has entered a contract to make a conscious decision to terminate that contract in a manner that is compatible with the requirements of the Consumer Contracts Regulations. An ET generally arises when a customer notices that they have been switched to another supplier4 without their authority. Unquote

    Not sure where you have quoted from, so did a search.

    This was the only other libk that came up
    https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/system/files/docs/2016/07/agenda_item_5-bpd_cooling_off_policy_paper.pdf

    Was this the source.

    As it also says:
    Cooling Off
    There is an inter-dependency between this issue and the issues of:
    lock out periods (Issue BPD i23) and erroneous transfers (Issue
    BPD i13)

    and also
    1.Domestic customers have statutory ‘cooling off’ rights to cancel a
    services contract within 14 days of entering into that contract.
    TOM v2 set out as a policy objective that, following cancellation under cooling off,a customer should be returned to the original
    supplier on the terms they would have operated under had the switch not taken place.

    So whilst you may be literally correct, there appears to be an interdependency involved its the same outcome to be expected.

    To be fair, I'm not really sure what that paper actually is. It appears to be some kind of minutes of an open issues meeting.
    Not sure if it is meant for the public, or whether it really should be quoted as policy.

    If you want to get more into it, it seems to talk about TOM v2, which seems just like an ET to me, at least by the outcome. I;ve no odea who the heck TOM is, let alone the difference between v1 and v2
    ... so it will be no surprise I have no idea how it relates to an ET either.

    Perhaps you could clarify, please?

    The paper appears to end up with various open options still to be agreed on how to handle certain things - all too complicated for my little brain to understand, I'm afraid.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 451.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 239.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 615.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.1K Life & Family
  • 252.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.