We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Vanguard Target Retirement
sebthered
Posts: 43 Forumite
About to invest my maturing cash ISA, and had planned on investing in a VLS 60 S&S ISA. Just reviewing performance etc and noticed their Vanguard Target Retirement funds, wondered if the asset mix/underlying funds is a better option...? thoughts and opinions gratefully received.
https://www.vanguard.co.uk/uk/portal/detail/mf/overview?portId=9668&assetCode=BALANCED##overview
https://www.vanguard.co.uk/uk/portal/detail/mf/overview?portId=9668&assetCode=BALANCED##overview
0
Comments
-
The thing with these funds is they 'lifestyle' your investments from riskier to safer or less volatile ones as you approach your retirement date. This is to preserve your capital so you could purchase an annuity. Now with the pension freedoms lifestyling has become less popular and people will stay invested for longer. So these may or may not be appropriate for you depending upon your plans for when you retire0
-
Vanguards timing of the launch of these target retirement funds was strange as it coincided with most providers pulling those due to the changes in the pension freedom options.
However, Vanguard don't fully disinvest like a traditional lifestyling option. If you are not buying an annuity or using 100% of the funds to spend on day 1 of your retirement, then these are unlikely to be a good idea.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
I think that the retirement funds are a good idea - as I see it they are a simple extension to VLS in that you start off young with a VLS80 and end up old with a VLS20.0
-
If I was 65 with up to 30 years left in me, I wouldn't want to be 80% bonds/fixed income unless I had an expected expenditure such as a annuity or mortgage repayment. I'd be looking to keep up with inflation and an increasing incomestart off young with a VLS80 and end up old with a VLS20.0 -
I think these are a reasonable alternative to the Lifestrategy as they automatically reduce the % of equities over the period of savings which means you do not need to think about adjusting your allocations.
In the early years they are 80% equities and gradually reduce to 50:50 between 20 and 5 yrs to retirement and then reduce again to 30% equities by 10 yrs after the selected date.
Perfect 'fire n forget' for long term retirement savings.0 -
Can you get these through regular sites like H&L etc, or do you have to go through Vanguard directly?0
-
I think that the retirement funds are a good idea - as I see it they are a simple extension to VLS in that you start off young with a VLS80 and end up old with a VLS20.
Not if you planning to be in drawdown in retirement. If it was an annuity or full withdrawal planned on that date, then absolutely right that risk reduction should take place. However, with drawdown, you are going to be invested for another 25-30 years.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Not if you planning to be in drawdown in retirement. If it was an annuity or full withdrawal planned on that date, then absolutely right that risk reduction should take place. However, with drawdown, you are going to be invested for another 25-30 years.
yes this is true - but there is nothing to stop you buying the retirement fund that hits the least risky level when you're 100 rather than 70.0 -
Cannot agree...50% equity allocation from age 65 is not unreasonable and 30% from age 75, again not unreasonable...not far off the allocations I am operating now with my Lifestrategy drawdown.Not if you planning to be in drawdown in retirement0 -
Cannot agree...50% equity allocation from age 65 is not unreasonable and 30% from age 75, again not unreasonable...not far off the allocations I am operating now with my Lifestrategy drawdown.
Nor is 80% equity allocation at age 65 unreasonable.
What is reasonable is your risk profile and capacity for loss and whilst it is normal for people to drop a little down the risk profile in retirement, it tends to be a slower move and not as extreme.
Also, if you have invested for 20-30-40 years, you are likely to be very aware of markets and your knowledge is likely to somewhat compensate for some of the risk reduction.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards