78 Page Document from Parking Eye

JayEdgerHoover

Looks like the court case is going ahead then, and wht a waste of paper.

I haven't read all 78 pages because it looks boring as !!!!. It seems they have tried to enforce their claim by referencing a load of other cases - there is a 39 page supplement on Cavendish Sq. Holdings vs. Talal El Makdessi

They've also fought my 'signage' argument with pics of the signs (one of them looks suspect - stock photo)

What's the next step? Are they just showing my their argument, but still hoping that I back down?

All thoughts welcome?

bargepole

JayEdgerHoover wrote: »

Looks like the court case is going ahead then, and wht a waste of paper.

I haven't read all 78 pages because it looks boring as !!!!. It seems they have tried to enforce their claim by referencing a load of other cases - there is a 39 page supplement on Cavendish Sq. Holdings vs. Talal El Makdessi

They've also fought my 'signage' argument with pics of the signs (one of them looks suspect - stock photo)

What's the next step? Are they just showing my their argument, but still hoping that I back down?

All thoughts welcome?

Only 78 pages? One person I helped had a 180-page version, you got off lightly.

99% of it is irrelevant template rubbish, which one Judge described as 'prolix' and struck it out.

Fruitcake

I trust you have read the court guide in the NEWBIES by the very same bargepole that has just posted. There is also a whole court section in the NEWBIES for you to familiarise yourself with.

The_Deep

This is a small claims court hearing a piddling parking charge, which may be devoid of merit anyway.


Surely Judges must see this sort of behaviour as a waste of the court's time, and an abuse of the system.

Coupon-mad

JayEdgerHoover wrote: »

Looks like the court case is going ahead then, and wht a waste of paper.

I haven't read all 78 pages because it looks boring as !!!!. It seems they have tried to enforce their claim by referencing a load of other cases - there is a 39 page supplement on Cavendish Sq. Holdings vs. Talal El Makdessi

They've also fought my 'signage' argument with pics of the signs (one of them looks suspect - stock photo)

What's the next step? Are they just showing my their argument, but still hoping that I back down?

All thoughts welcome?

You'll know what your next step is because the court letter setting the hearing date told you the deadline to get your own Witness statement and evidence filed. Unless you've done that already (I am not talking about the initial defence).

Read the NEWBIES thread post #2 first. Tells you about all the stages, what to do and how.

JayEdgerHoover

Coupon-mad wrote: »

You'll know what your next step is because the court letter setting the hearing date told you the deadline to get your own Witness statement and evidence filed. Unless you've done that already (I am not talking about the initial defence).

Read the NEWBIES thread post #2 first. Tells you about all the stages, what to do and how.

Hi there, I'm not sure if I did an 'initial defence' I just filled out all the forms the court sent me then I copied, pasted and edited the defence from here - that's the only thing I sent them. I ignored all letters from Parking Eye until they made a court claim

Coupon-mad

So what did your defence say exactly? And did you include it with the paperwork, attached, so that a defence was actually filed? What did it say?

And like I said:

You'll know what your next step is because the court letter setting the hearing date told you the deadline to get your own Witness statement and evidence filed. Unless you've done that already (I am not talking about the initial defence).

Read the NEWBIES thread post #2 first. Tells you about all the stages, what to do and how.