We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

vehicle leasing

2»

Comments

  • alilow
    alilow Posts: 10 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary First Post
    I have read that sole traders count as businesses rather than consumers but that if the trader offers me credit terms up to £25,000 I have the same protection as individuals under the CCA. So would I have the automatic rejection rights you mention
  • wealdroam
    wealdroam Posts: 19,180 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    alilow wrote: »
    I have read that sole traders count as businesses rather than consumers but that if the trader offers me credit terms up to £25,000 I have the same protection as individuals under the CCA. So would I have the automatic rejection rights you mention
    You are almost right - except your last sentence.

    As explained before, the CCA gives you exactly the same rights as a consumer. But it is the CCA that does that.

    The words in Section 75 of the CCA are:
    75 Liability of creditor for breaches by supplier.

    (1) If the debtor under a debtor-creditor-supplier agreement falling within section 12(b) or (c) has, in relation to a transaction financed by the agreement, any claim against the supplier in respect of a misrepresentation or breach of contract, he shall have a like claim against the creditor, who, with the supplier, shall accordingly be jointly and severally liable to the debtor.

    So if you have a claim under the Consumer Rights Act, then you can seek a remedy for that claim from either your seller or your credit provider, or both.

    Unfortunately, as a trader you do not have a claim under the Consumer Rights Act, therefore equally, you do not have a claim against your credit provider.
  • alilow
    alilow Posts: 10 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary First Post
    I am a little confused by your answer. If the contract is covered by the CCA does this not mean that I am been classed as a consumer and therefore entitled to the rights under this law?
  • wealdroam
    wealdroam Posts: 19,180 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    alilow wrote: »
    I am a little confused by your answer. If the contract is covered by the CCA does this not mean that I am been classed as a consumer and therefore entitled to the rights under this law?
    No.

    In post#8 Unholyangel explained that the CCA covers sole traders as well as consumers.

    That is not the case with the Consumer Rights Act.
    The CRA does not cover purchases made by a business.

    Perhaps another way of saying it is...

    Yes, your contract is covered by the CCA.
    No, it does not mean that you are being classed as a consumer. It means that as a sole trader your contract is covered by the CCA.

    As I said before. as a sole trader, i.e. a business, you cannot seek a remedy under the CRA and thus you have no claim against the seller.

    As you have no claim against the seller, it follows you cannot seek a remedy from your credit provider.
  • alilow
    alilow Posts: 10 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary First Post
    So although the garage supplied me with a car that would have been dangerous for me to use the law gives me no protection?
  • bris
    bris Posts: 10,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    alilow wrote: »
    So although the garage supplied me with a car that would have been dangerous for me to use the law gives me no protection?
    The vehicle is covered by the sale of goods act, which covers all contracts with consumers having the CCA giving consumers added protection.


    To say you are not protected is an exaggeration considering they took back the car to rectify the situation, time being the key sticking point here.


    As a business when you enter into a contract you do not get your hand held for you like consumers do so you really need to know what you are signing.


    It's difficult for a business to claim unfair terms for this reason. What you need to do is sue for breach of contract and let the courts decide, it would probably go in your favour but without knowing what the contract states it's impossible for anyone apart from the judge to decide if the remedy they are offering is fair or not.
  • wealdroam
    wealdroam Posts: 19,180 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    alilow wrote: »
    So although the garage supplied me with a car that would have been dangerous for me to use the law gives me no protection?
    There are only so many ways that the interaction of The CCA with other legislation can be explained, so I'll leave it for someone else.

    This is the first mention of a vehicle being too dangerous to use.
    Perhaps you should accuse the seller of selling an unroadworthy motor vehicle... that would give you yet another set of legislation to study.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.