📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

PPI Company rights

Options
Hi,
I claimed PPI through a company back in 2013 and at the time the Clydesdale Bank refused any PPI but I got a letter yesterday directly from the bank offering me a fair bit of PPI compensation. I did not contact them.
Can the PPI company that put the original claim in take a cut of this money even though it is 3 and 1/2 years later...?

Comments

  • McKneff
    McKneff Posts: 38,857 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You need to check the terms and conditions you signed.
    I thinks its likely to be honest.
    Did the bank say why ?
    make the most of it, we are only here for the weekend.
    and we will never, ever return.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,722 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Can the PPI company that put the original claim in take a cut of this money even though it is 3 and 1/2 years later...?

    No. If the bank volunteers to reopen a previously rejected complaint then the CMC cannot bill you against it unless it was through the actions of the CMC that got it reopened (and it never is but some CMCs are crafty and get people to sign another agreement a couple of years later).

    If the CMC attempts to get money they are in breach of their regulatory guidelines. This scenario is exactly given in their rules.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,735 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    McKneff wrote: »
    You need to check the terms and conditions you signed.
    I thinks its likely to be honest.
    Did the bank say why ?

    Clydesdale were given a kicking by the regulator for their miss-handling of PPI complaints including staff deleting references to PPI before sending copies of data out or not bothering to look for old records and saying they had, fair chance they have simply reviewed the cases from the period and realised their mistake.

    I'd assume the claims company will demand a cut as they raised the case, I'd keep the money in savings and not tell them and await a demand for payment.

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.