We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Claimant sending defendant documents(disclosure,but missing some out,he sent to court
ardvo
Posts: 57 Forumite
For an oral hearing, (bundle of documents required to be sent by the claimant),
where the claimant puts their challenge /files their Bundle containing their argument in a written document
and the defendant does a skeleton argument against the claimants argument bundle
(Judge is a Judge HHJ)
======================================================
If the bundle is sent to the defendant,
they then respond to this bundle with their skeleton argument
and this Claimant bundle is sent to the court (as requested)
If the bundle sent to the COURT contains the same documents as sent in the defendants bundle
BUT this court bundle has 'more' documents on,
(so basically the court /judges bundle will have MORE documents to rely on,
which have NOT been included in the defendants' original bundle sent to them.
The MAIN parts of the hearing/dispute would be included in the defendants’ original bundle
- Just the Judges bundle would contain more documents, (which the defendant has NOT seen)
[QUESTIONS]
Then what is the worse case scenario that can happen? (from the claimants point of view)
EXAMPLE:
* The defendant can request the Hearing to be Stopped/postponed
on grounds of non proper disclosure of documents?
or the judge could still carry on the hearing on the basis that the 'additional' documents would be
disregarded, as the defendant has not got a copy of them ?
[QUESTION] What is the WORSE CASE SCENARIO that can happen, from the claimants’ point of view?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~#
where the claimant puts their challenge /files their Bundle containing their argument in a written document
and the defendant does a skeleton argument against the claimants argument bundle
(Judge is a Judge HHJ)
======================================================
If the bundle is sent to the defendant,
they then respond to this bundle with their skeleton argument
and this Claimant bundle is sent to the court (as requested)
If the bundle sent to the COURT contains the same documents as sent in the defendants bundle
BUT this court bundle has 'more' documents on,
(so basically the court /judges bundle will have MORE documents to rely on,
which have NOT been included in the defendants' original bundle sent to them.
The MAIN parts of the hearing/dispute would be included in the defendants’ original bundle
- Just the Judges bundle would contain more documents, (which the defendant has NOT seen)
[QUESTIONS]
Then what is the worse case scenario that can happen? (from the claimants point of view)
EXAMPLE:
* The defendant can request the Hearing to be Stopped/postponed
on grounds of non proper disclosure of documents?
or the judge could still carry on the hearing on the basis that the 'additional' documents would be
disregarded, as the defendant has not got a copy of them ?
[QUESTION] What is the WORSE CASE SCENARIO that can happen, from the claimants’ point of view?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~#
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards