We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
If the Labour Party didn't exist, would anyone today invent it?
Options
Comments
-
I thought Blair was an oily creep from the first I ever heard of him. I have always found it astounding that this was not equally obvious to everyone.0
-
westernpromise wrote: »
The common view, stable for 10 years now, is that Blair lied to start a war.
Blair allowed himself to be sucked in by the US.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Blair allowed himself to be sucked in by the US.
No, he was not passively sucked into something. He was a proactive liar.0 -
westernpromise wrote: »No, he was not passively sucked into something. He was a proactive liar.
I thought the story was that Blair told our US ambassador to 'stick his head as far up the American's posterior as it would go'. Or words to that effect.:)0 -
I thought the story was that Blair told our US ambassador to 'stick his head as far up the American's posterior as it would go'. Or words to that effect.:)
He was an active and willing accomplice. He did not sit there passively being persuaded - he actively fabricated "evidence" of WMD, actively misrepresented it to the HoC and hounded to his death a WMD expert who said there weren't any. He was up to his neck and every bit as culpable as the US.0 -
Pertinent to Labours future, Newsnight last night did a long piece from Holland by Gabriel Gatehouse who grew up there. The conclusion was that the famous liberalism associated with the Dutch is well and truly a thing of the past.
This is why I keep banging on about 'liberalism' and 'progressives' being well past sell by date.
Labour is associated with lefty liberalism in the public consciousness. Peoples sense of fairness is at odds with the fairness 'progressives' have bought us.
We can bang on all day about Blair, Corbyn and Labour but in the end the essential problem for the left in general is that it is mis-alighned with the public mood. I have a thread on this death of liberalism in Discussion Time0 -
westernpromise wrote: »I thought Blair was an oily creep from the first I ever heard of him. I have always found it astounding that this was not equally obvious to everyone.0
-
-
Today Corbyn tweeted a request to supporters to sign a petition against Conservative cuts to disability benefits.
It was soon hastily deleted. Can you see why?
Labour and JC in particular just come across as rank amateurs.If I don't reply to your post,
you're probably on my ignore list.0 -
The truth is you tories fear him and also secretly respect him because he was successful and capable. By the way the tories in general supported the war in Iraq....something that gets conveniently forgotten now!
He's like labours very own Margaret thatcher.
Time has been and gone. Longer you cling on to the 'glory' days then the longer you'll be stuck with the likes of Corbyn.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards