We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
No mention of letters being sent before LBC/LBA
Lost_boy
Posts: 4 Newbie
Do they not have to mention to the court that they sent NTK and other chase up letters.
is just stating LBC/LBA was sent and not responded to suffcient for Pre action protocol..
this is what was written in the form sent to cour at a set aside hearing.
As the charges still remained outstanding the Claimant instructed our firm to seek recovery of the outstanding balance. A Letter before Claim was sent to the Defendant [address] on 21 June 2016 and as no reply was received, proceedings were issued on 07 July 2016. Proceedings were issued at the same address of in compliance with CPR 6.9. Due to no formal response to the Claim Form being received Judgment was entered against the Defendant. Judgment is regular and should not be set aside”.
this was written by people who deserve gallstones!
2. Can I question the equipment that they use? like who sets the date and time on the pcn machine and camera for recording evidence.
is just stating LBC/LBA was sent and not responded to suffcient for Pre action protocol..
this is what was written in the form sent to cour at a set aside hearing.
As the charges still remained outstanding the Claimant instructed our firm to seek recovery of the outstanding balance. A Letter before Claim was sent to the Defendant [address] on 21 June 2016 and as no reply was received, proceedings were issued on 07 July 2016. Proceedings were issued at the same address of in compliance with CPR 6.9. Due to no formal response to the Claim Form being received Judgment was entered against the Defendant. Judgment is regular and should not be set aside”.
this was written by people who deserve gallstones!
2. Can I question the equipment that they use? like who sets the date and time on the pcn machine and camera for recording evidence.
0
Comments
-
No, they can say what they like to try to contest a set-aside. Who is 'they'? I assume the set aside hearing has not taken place yet? USE IT TO WIN!
Don't question equipment, do a decent defence in readiness like here:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5585047
They even got their £255 straight back, claim struck out, no case to answer unless CEL re-pleaded it and started again.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards