We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Home Insurance - Specified Items Value?

imroberts
imroberts Posts: 132 Forumite
edited 24 February 2017 at 4:43PM in Insurance & life assurance
I have a piano, the value of which exceeds the single article limit of most insurance policies.

Prior to this year I have managed to find home insurance with a high single article limit sufficient to cover it, however this year I can't, so will need to list it as a specified item.

The issue is I don't know how I should value it - the retail price seems to increase every few months and over the last 12 months for example the retail price has increased by 25%.

What value should I declare to the insurers?
1) My original purchase price
2) The current retail price
3) The current RRP
4) A value based on (2) or (3) but increased further to allow for potential price rises over the term of the policy

I don't want to end up underinsured should something happen, however I'm also conscious that valuing things wildly over the odds can also be frowned upon, so any advice would be appreciated!

Comments

  • Check the wording of any policy you intend to buy, or, easier; call them.

    A lot of policies only require you to specify valuables like art or jewellery.

    You may find you don't need to specify it.

    But, to answer your question, you should insure it for the current retail price as new, as best you can.
  • Blibble
    Blibble Posts: 503 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Presuming it is a new-for-old cover on the policy, you should insure it for the market value it would cost to replace. If in doubt, it may be worth getting a couple of independent valuations and taking the highest of those; better to over-insure it then under-insure it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.