We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tenant renewal fees not in contract - do I have to pay?
Comments
-
Sorry maybe I didn't make this clear - but it is the estate agent in the middle who will be getting the renewal fee, rather than the landlord. So the landlord doesn't have the power to waive the fee.0
-
Sorry maybe I didn't make this clear - but it is the estate agent in the middle who will be getting the renewal fee, rather than the landlord. So the landlord doesn't have the power to waive the fee.
You misunderstand the situation.
The agent cannot charge anything without the landlord's consent. You are negotiating with your landlord. Whether your landlord gets her agent to actually waive the fee or pays it herself is immaterial to you.
If your landlord is 'desperate' presumably £100 is nothing. Otherwise, it means that she isn't so desperate after all and you probably won't be evicted for not renewing...0 -
I got sick of these fees and contacted my LL direct to ask whether they had any particular objection to going onto a periodic tenancy and saving us both the charges. They were fine, although the agency didn't like us speaking together (laughably claimed it was "illegal").They are an EYESORES!!!!0
-
I'd never heard of the option of it automatically becoming a periodic tenancy. However, sadly I don't think it will work for us.
Our landlord is desperate to make us fix for another year, even though it's actually really inconvenient and we want 6 months (I start a new job in a different area of the city in October)
If you only want to be in that area for another 6 months, don't feel pressured to sign another years fixed term.
The laws of the land automatically change a fixed term tenancy into a periodic tenancy at its end, the landlord and letting agent have zero say in the matter.
And they have zero reason to issue you with a S.21. Assuming you pay your rent on time. Ignore that threat.
However you could always compromise and ask for a 6 month fixed term.*Assuming you're in England or Wales.0 -
Another reason tocontact the LL is to ask if he is also paying a renewal fee to the agent.
The TPO Code of Practice for letting agents does not allow agents to charge twice for the sae service, though I strongly suspect this frequently happens.5n You must not make a tenant or landlord pay a charge for or be
liable for an element of your service that the other party has also been charged for in the course of the same transaction.
You can also stress to the LL that you preference to gor periodic does not mean you plan to leave, just that you don't like the fees.0 -
Another reason tocontact the LL is to ask if he is also paying a renewal fee to the agent.
The TPO Code of Practice for letting agents does not allow agents to charge twice for the sae service, though I strongly suspect this frequently happens.
How could that ever be enforcible? If the fee is often not particularly representative of the direct costs of organising a renewal, couldn't the LA just argue it was one fee split between the LL and tenant (rather than charged twice)0 -
How could that ever be enforcible? If the fee is often not particularly representative of the direct costs of organising a renewal, couldn't the LA just argue it was one fee split between the LL and tenant (rather than charged twice)
Of course. The TPO does not seem to understand agency...0 -
Hey - I didn't write the code! Just suggesting another possible way forward for the OP.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards