We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Land Registry - Tenant in Common after sole survivor registration
Options

fcandmp
Posts: 155 Forumite

We are just about to sell late FIL's property, which was reregistered in his sole name after MIL passed a few years back.
We have now been told by our solicitor that the Tenant in Common flag is still set against the property and there is is an administrative change needed in the way the property is being sold, adding his daughter's name (my wife), so there are three sellers to the sale contract - she is also an executor with her brother if that makes any difference and a deed of appropriation is in place.
How can the tenant in common flag remain, is this just an administrative error by the land registry as surely it makes no sense when the property is reregistered just in one name?
Are there any tax or legal implications for my wife of doing what our solicitor is suggesting that she be named as a 3rd seller?
Many thanks
We have now been told by our solicitor that the Tenant in Common flag is still set against the property and there is is an administrative change needed in the way the property is being sold, adding his daughter's name (my wife), so there are three sellers to the sale contract - she is also an executor with her brother if that makes any difference and a deed of appropriation is in place.
How can the tenant in common flag remain, is this just an administrative error by the land registry as surely it makes no sense when the property is reregistered just in one name?
Are there any tax or legal implications for my wife of doing what our solicitor is suggesting that she be named as a 3rd seller?
Many thanks
0
Comments
-
What probably happened is the name was removed(just needs death cert) and the restriction left.
Don't think it need 3sellers just 2 land reg rep usually pics up these threads so can confirm. Executors will be a single entity
If the sale is still from the estate there should be no fallout tax/legal.0 -
Tenants in Common means M-i-L and F-i-L each owned part of the house... 50:50 is assumed if the proportion is not specified somewhere.
So when M-i-L passed, her will could have left her share to someone other than F-i-L... Did it?
Did her Estate go through Probate (who was Executor, find their records)?
Who actually owns the M-i-L's share, as they will need to be party to the sale. {There may be Capital Gains Tax implications?}
Joint Tenants would have meant both owned 100% and the survivor got the whole house.0 -
Rodders53, thanks.
MIL left all to FIL in will ad probate was granted back in 2014.
When FIL died in 2016 he left all to his three children, two of which are executors now selling. A bare trust is in place / deed of Appropriation on behalf of three beneficiaries. We are aware of the CGT liability, and thi query Is just about the TIC flag at land registry.0 -
it the TIC restriction is there it is because the MIL estate did not remove it if it could have done.
not a big deal just needs ANY another person to act in the sale.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards