We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Scottish court issues damages to couple over distress caused by neighbour's use of CC

13»

Comments

  • Yes, I will continue to recommend people read the official ICO guidance, not listen to an armchair expert who thinks he knows it all.
    Read by all means "guidance" I know nothing about armchairs you a confused there ? Much as you appear to be with cctv
    We have installed hundreds if not 1000s of of cctv systems for both public and private clients ... I personally don't install them but I'll take the legal teams advice over yours:rotfl:
  • TheCyclingProgrammer
    TheCyclingProgrammer Posts: 3,702 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    edited 10 February 2017 at 7:10PM
    Read by all means "guidance" I know nothing about armchairs you a confused there ? Much as you appear to be with cctv
    We have installed hundreds if not 1000s of of cctv systems for both public and private clients ... I personally don't install them but I'll take the legal teams advice over yours:rotfl:

    Ah, I should have known, you flog CCTV for a living...its all clear now. Not only an armchair expert, but one with an agenda.

    I can imagine the sales pitch..."yeah yeah mate, s'all legal innit, don't worry about that ICO guidance they don't have a clue, my "lawyers" said its all legit, just sign here cheers mate".

    I wasn't going to bother adding you to my ignore list but seeing as you have nothing useful to contribute...
  • Ah, I should have known, you flog CCTV for a living...its all clear now. Not only an armchair expert, but one with an agenda.

    I can imagine the sales pitch..."yeah yeah mate, s'all legal innit, don't worry about that ICO guidance they don't have a clue, my "lawyers" said its all legit, just sign here cheers mate".
    Wrong again I see a pattern forming:rotfl:
  • jhe
    jhe Posts: 1,831 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Well you've read the same thing as me. To me it seems clear you should register as a data controller using the link provided, but your call.
    Thanks , I don't actually read it that way, if it is not illegal I am not doing anything wrong,
    Registered installers should know what they are telling me so any come back I will be back in touch with them,
    I appreciate your advice though , thanks
  • George_Bray
    George_Bray Posts: 734 Forumite
    savemoney wrote: »
    I have CCTV two IP cameras on front of house to monitor car

    I think that's a really good idea, and it would be OTT for pedestrians or anyone else to complain, just because you're filming a bit beyond the boundary of your property. I see, however, that you're supposed to cough up £35 per year to register - a pointless rip-off in my opinion.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.