We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BW Legal Excel Peel Centre from 2012
Comments
-
IamEmanresu wrote: »This will all come down to the pics of the car on the day. If they want to press a claim in court, BW will have to produce them.
To save all the parties hassle, then write to BW and ask for copies of the pics of the car they will rely on at court.
If they send them, then you can decide. If they don't, then you can continue to ask to show a court a level of unreasonableness on BW's part.
Saves all the messing around with technical arguments. The valid ticket was either visible or it wasn't.
We already asked for the photos and they have sent them. The ticket is not visible on the pictures they have shared of the windscreen and dashboard. They also enclosed pictures of the signage, but that was dated 2015, not 2012?! At the time in 2012, we sent them a scan of the valid ticket which we had assumed must have fallen/blown off the dashboard. They replied that the ticket would not be accepted. We ignored the next few letters and it went quiet up until recently.
Based on the above, do we have any defence if it does go to court?0 -
Yes, certainly! Peel Centre is shocking re signage in 2012 - and hopefully you can also rely on 'no keeper liability' if the driver was never implied or named in your appeal and they are just pursuing the same person named on the PCN back in 2012.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Coupon-mad wrote: »Yes, certainly! Peel Centre is shocking re signage in 2012 - and hopefully you can also rely on 'no keeper liability' if the driver was never implied or named in your appeal and they are just pursuing the same person named on the PCN back in 2012.
We named the driver (my wife) unfortunately, when we sent the ticket and appealed.0 -
OK so signage and the usual BW Legal muck ups...PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
jameseyre1 wrote: »We named the driver (my wife) unfortunately, when we sent the ticket and appealed.
rookie error , you wont be doing that ever again !!
0 -
-
I repeat, how much are they asking for?You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
-
Same as ever, try searching the forum for 'BW Legal £54' or 'Peel Centre 2012' and read all the other threads exactly like yours. All defendable - the signs were pants and the defences are strong.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards