We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Coerced into taking out a policy
Winger1
Posts: 1 Newbie
In the 90's, Barclays threatened to withdraw my over draft facility of £40,000, which I used as a sole trader to operate my business. My personal manager suggested that if I sign up via Barclays Bank for a life assurance policy, then I could continue to have the overdraft facility. I thought I had signed up to the £42 per month policy (which occasionally incurred interest as it sometimes came out of the over draft) until I was 60 years old, only to find on reaching 60 it actually ran for a further 10 years. I have not used my overdraft facility for many years, and have suggested cancelling the policy and withdrawing the overdraft facility (and the relevant monthly admin charges) to successful business managers only to be told that to do so might not be in my best interest as the terms and conditions - and thus the charges- would be reviewed (not favourably) . Do I have a case to complain, seek compensation and to whom?
0
Comments
-
In the 90's, Barclays threatened to withdraw my over draft facility of £40,000, which I used as a sole trader to operate my business. My personal manager suggested that if I sign up via Barclays Bank for a life assurance policy, then I could continue to have the overdraft facility.
Very common for lenders to insist on life assurance for commercial borrowing back then and you still see it today. Especially where there is a key employee/individual where the business would fail without them.I thought I had signed up to the £42 per month policy (which occasionally incurred interest as it sometimes came out of the over draft) until I was 60 years old, only to find on reaching 60 it actually ran for a further 10 years.
Life assurance is set up for a term but after that, it is effectively pay as you go until the end date. You are free to stop it when you like.Do I have a case to complain, seek compensation and to whom?
Cant see why. The bank is allowed to insist on insurance as part of the deal. However, they cannot insist on their own product being used (they could until some time in the 2000s). If you dont like their terms then you are free to take your business elsewhere.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
The bank was lending you £40,000, they let you now that if you wanted that size of overdraft at those rates they wanted you to have insurance, presumably in the hop that your estate would have the funds to repay the debt if you died. You could have said no to the insurance, in which case they may well have been willing to lend you less, or to lend you a similar amount but at higher rates to relect the greater risk to them.
If you no longer need such a large overdraft then you can cancel the uinsurance, and if that measn that they cancel the overdraftfacility then so be it.
if you do still ned it, then you are free to shop around to see if another bank will take you on, or indeed whether Barclays will offer you thesame facility but without the insurance, and what the costs of that would be.
They can't back-date changes to your terms but they are entitled to review the terms of your account to take into account changes in your situation. And if you want to change the terms (for instance, by lowering the overdraft or no longer having the insurance linked to it) then they are almost certainly fre to take the opportunityto review your account more generally, and if (for instnace) you have a partiualrly favourable rate in terms of interest or charges that may be reviewed.All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)0 -
But surely as Dunstonh says - it may be much easier if you still need it - to go and get a standalone life insurance policy (no doubt cheaper than Barclays).If you do still need it, then you are free to shop around to see if another bank will take you on, or indeed whether Barclays will offer you thesame facility but without the insurance, and what the costs of that would be. .
Barclays can insist on the life cover to protect them, but not that it arranged through them...
Getting another bank account sounds like the hard way, if the overdraft is needed.
And if you don't need as much overdraft - your policy will be for a smaller sum and so cheaper again.I am just thinking out loud - nothing I say should be relied upon!
I do however reserve the right to be correct by accident.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards