We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Car warranty
Comments
-
You can argue all you want, it doesn't change the fact that the OP gave them the right to fix it.CoolHotCold wrote: »I would Argue Not.
From Section 24 of the CRA
I would argue that 5 weeks without a motor vehicle (after use of it for 6 days only) is both a significant inconvenience and not a reasonable time, and so entitled to their final right of rejection.
The time frame for significant inconvenience has never been determined and would be the result of circumstances. There is more than a good chance they have a loan car, or a second car, or they could even hire a car and bill it to the seller as a consequential loss. Only the OP can convince a court they are significantly inconvenienced.0 -
OK I'll phone the finance company back tomorrow.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards