We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Share of equity?
Faith1630
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hi there. My partner and I have a joint mortgage. We separated 10 years ago. I initially stayed in the property paying the mortgage, then I rented it out for a time. My ex moved back in around 5 years ago and has paid the mortgage since. He has made significant improvements to the property since I left. He now wants to sell. Will I be entitled to half the equity, or will I be due half minus the money he has spent on improvements?
0
Comments
-
Assuming the improvements have increased the value of the house and can be proven to have done so, assuming he paid for them himself and you didn't contribute, then yes he is probably entitled to reimbursement of those costs before equity is split, you both benefit from the work he has done by the increased sale price
Separately does he know you rented it out and did you give hime half of the rental profits when you did?It may sometimes seem like I can't spell, I can, I just can't type0 -
Thank you. Does he need to have proof of the cost of the work that was undertaken? He knows it was rented out but he didn't receive a share of the profits. He wasn't interested in anything to do with it at the time.0
-
I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0
-
Ok Faith, I don't want to put words in your mouth so please correct me if I am wrong.
It seems from your question that you want/expect half of the equity in the house because you own half of it? However you didn't feel it necessary to pay your ex half of the rental profit even though he owned half of the house.
If that is the case, I am not passing judgement. It's non of mine or anybody elses business. I am just playing devils advocate and trying to get you to look at the whole picture, not just the current one. You could argue that you are in debt to him for half of the rental profit as a separate issue to the equity share when soldIt may sometimes seem like I can't spell, I can, I just can't type0 -
If it was me then I would work to come to a fair compromise. Forcing an equity split would require lawyers, courts etc and will cost you. Far better to try and do 'what is right'.
That said, it does depend what 'improvements' he made as it doesn't always directly collate to increased value - i.e. 5k kitchen doesn't automatically bring 5k value - could be less, could be more. It could increase in value purely on market.
Try and solve amicably, allow some leeway for the money and time he invested.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
