We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Lgps experts

Options
Hello any lgps experts.

http://www.lgps2014.org/content/additional-voluntary-contributions-avcs

This page in the lgps website suggests any avc contract taken after April 2014 can be taken as cash (subject to it being 25% or less of the total pension value)

May be me going mad but I thought they stopped this in 2014 - was I mistaken ?

Additionally, if you take pension at 55 how do the lgps calculate the total pension value - at NRA I think they multiply it by 20. This is quite crucial if anyone is thinking of banging in abc's to take at early retirement.

Thank you in advance 😃
«1

Comments

  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,101 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 28 January 2017 at 5:51PM
    There was talk of HMRC stopping this - as far as I know, the LGPS is the only pension provider which adds the value of the LGPS to the AVC pot and then allows 25% of the total to be taken as tax free cash. Other providers - including other public sector schemes - keep the sums separate, and only allow 25% of the AVC to be taken as cash.

    If you take reduced benefits at 55, then the notional value (for 25% tax free cash purposes) is still 20 x the reduced pension plus any automatic lump sum.
  • Sambella
    Sambella Posts: 417 Forumite
    I've helped Parliament
    So if you have a 5,000 pension and a 10,000 automatic lump sum:-

    5000 x 20 + 10,000 = 110,000

    25% of this is 27,500

    Does this 27,500 consist of the 10k automatic lump sum plus £17,500 from your AVC if you have it?
  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,101 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 28 January 2017 at 6:54PM
    So if you have a 5,000 pension and a 10,000 automatic lump sum:-

    5000 x 20 + 10,000 = 110,000

    25% of this is 27,500

    Does this 27,500 consist of the 10k automatic lump sum plus £17,500 from your AVC if you have it?
    No - you have to factor the actual value of the AVC fund into your calculations. In your example, the £27,500 = the £10K automatic lump sum plus £17,500 commuted from the annual pension (subject to adjustments for the 1:12 commutation factors)

    So,
    £5K pension
    £10L lump sum
    £20K AVC

    20 x £5K + £10K + £20K = £130K x 25% = £32,500 maximum tax free cash,

    The tax free cash would be made up of £10K automatic lump sum, plus £20K AVC, plus £2,500 commuted from original pension (if that is what you want - it isn't compulsory). Again, subject to adjustments for commutation factor.

    However,
    £5K pension
    £10K automatic lump sum
    £30K AVC

    20 x £5K + £10K + £30K = £140K x 25% = £35K maximum tax free cash.

    In this case, the tax free cash would be £10K automatic lump sum plus only £25K from the AVC. The remaining £5K AVC can't be taken as cash, only as a pension of some description (depends on when you started to pay into the AVC fund).
  • greenglide
    greenglide Posts: 3,301 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker Hung up my suit!
    Other providers - including other public sector schemes - keep the sums separate, and only allow 25% of the AVC to be taken as cash.
    As long as they are technically the same scheme then I believe that all DB schemes can do it but it is up to them whether they chose to.

    Is it not the difference between free-standing AVCs and "proper" AVCs.

    My ex-employers scheme, from whom I retired last year, certainly allowed AVCs to be allowed to fund the PCLS - I took advantage of this. This was not a public sector scheme. The AVCs were retained within the scheme rather than using a third party party as public sector scheme tend to.

    Of course, in the days of "automatic" lump sums in public sector schemes, it didnt matter, now it often does.
  • Sambella
    Sambella Posts: 417 Forumite
    I've helped Parliament
    Ahhh

    Thank you. I always wondered how this would be factored in.

    I plan to use my AVC to boost my pension income as I was a later starter to pensions and then was part time for 10 years before going full time so my yearly pension income , if I want to retire early, needs boosting.
  • chiefie
    chiefie Posts: 406 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts
    There was talk of HMRC stopping this - as far as I know, the LGPS is the only pension provider which adds the value of the LGPS to the AVC pot and then allows 25% of the total to be taken as tax free cash. Other providers - including other public sector schemes - keep the sums separate, and only allow 25% of the AVC to be taken as cash.

    If you take reduced benefits at 55, then the notional value (for 25% tax free cash purposes) is still 20 x the reduced pension plus any automatic lump sum.

    Do you know if one county scheme can go against this ? Mine seem to be saying you can't do this yet the overarching lgps administrators say you can ?
  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,101 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 28 January 2017 at 8:17PM
    “ There was talk of HMRC stopping this - as far as I know, the LGPS is the only pension provider which adds the value of the LGPS to the AVC pot and then allows 25% of the total to be taken as tax free cash. Other providers - including other public sector schemes - keep the sums separate, and only allow 25% of the AVC to be taken as cash.

    If you take reduced benefits at 55, then the notional value (for 25% tax free cash purposes) is still 20 x the reduced pension plus any automatic lump sum.
    Originally posted by Silvertabby
    Do you know if one county scheme can go against this ? Mine seem to be saying you can't do this yet the overarching lgps administrators say you can ?
    Chiefie - I can't rule it out. There are LGPS rules and there are LGPS 'discretionary' rules. What does your specific scheme booklet say? HMRC has been wittering about this for a while now, so I suppose it's possible that your LGPS provider has decided to pre-empt the inevitable(?) ruling. If that's that case, then I'm afraid that I can't see that there's anything you can do about it.

    Slightly off track, but there are some LGPS providers who have applied their discretions in order NOT to pay pensions as trivial commutations. Doing so wipes out the spouse's benefits as well as the pension member's pension entitlements, so they are protecting themselves against any complaints from bereaved spouses who had been banking on receiving pension benefits.
  • marlot
    marlot Posts: 4,966 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    greenglide wrote: »
    As long as they are technically the same scheme then I believe that all DB schemes can do it but it is up to them whether they chose to...My ex-employers scheme, from whom I retired last year, certainly allowed AVCs to be allowed to fund the PCLS...
    I'm told my one of my employers that I can do it too. It's a private sector employer.
  • OldBeanz
    OldBeanz Posts: 1,436 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My wife is likely to receive a small LGPS pension. At present it is valued at £32k giving her a pension of £1.7k. She has another 4.5 years contributions to make which will give her a final pension of about £2.7k. Can I just divide £32k by 17 then multiply by £2.7k and add on her AVC to attain the correct figures for her max AVC lump sum?
  • chiefie
    chiefie Posts: 406 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts
    Chiefie - I can't rule it out. There are LGPS rules and there are LGPS 'discretionary' rules. What does your specific scheme booklet say? HMRC has been wittering about this for a while now, so I suppose it's possible that your LGPS provider has decided to pre-empt the inevitable(?) ruling. If that's that case, then I'm afraid that I can't see that there's anything you can do about it.

    Slightly off track, but there are some LGPS providers who have applied their discretions in order NOT to pay pensions as trivial commutations. Doing so wipes out the spouse's benefits as well as the pension member's pension entitlements, so they are protecting themselves against any complaints from bereaved spouses who had been banking on receiving pension benefits.
    Thanks - the scheme rules suggest not but I can't rule out they haven't updated things - at least that's what I am forlornly hoping :j
    Darn it !
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.