We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Buying a 2nd property - new 2016 Stamp Duty rules
polacoloco
Posts: 3 Newbie
Hi,
I need some help with finding a way to buy a house but minimizing a wooping 18k in Stamp Duty Tax.
I have bought a single bed apartment over 2 years ago. Since then I have found a partner and we are thinking of moving in together. I have rented out my flat as it is too small for us both and in the meantime we have rented a house which we live in.
It is clear to me that paying 1300 a month in rent is a waste of money and it would make sense to pay that as a mortgage installments instead.
After talking to my broker I have realized then now I would be hit with the higher Stamp Duty which would be 3% for the first 125k then 5% for the following 125% and 8% for everything above 250k. I m not planning on buying a property worth more than 350k (that equates to 18k in SDT)
The issues I have:
1. the flat still isnt on a buy to let mortgage but treated as my living address - I suspect I need to change that ASAP
2. I would like to keep that property as it generates a positive cashflow so selling to a 3rd party wouldnt be ideal
3. I could sell it to my LTD company (but I am not sure how would that work - i suspect the company would have to take a mortgage itself and from researching that 3 years ago the deposit was about 40% back then?) The company has a renting properties profile apart from my main one already as I am renting on a minimal scale
4. I think selling it to my company under some reasonable deal would free me from the increased Stamp Duty on the new property as it would make me as a person buying a property as a primary residence
5. On the other hand I suspect company would have to pay its own Stamp Duty - the flat was worth 129k when i bought it so market value now around 140k i recon - i would lower the value possibly and sell at a loss at 124.999? and hopefully pay no tax as my limited company is buying the 1st property or pay 3% only? I wouldnt mind having the company paying the mortgage but if there is a need for personal guarantee than i could give it but i recon then it would influence my credit capabilities and score for my new mortgage.
6. My partner doesnt have a property at all but she doesnt have a deposit either. My broker was indicating to me that even if we bought it together which i would like to do it would still fall under 2nd property and the increased Stamp Duty Tax as I already have a flat.
7. Buying a property with my partner would I assume increase our credit capabilities and make it more appealing to the landers - we would have sign some sort of paperwork stating that all the deposit is mine but the mortgage payments are a responsibility of both of us.
The interesting points would be if my company while owing the flat can take for example amortization from it and treat mortgage payments as cost? if so then even paying the stamp duty tax now would in the long run work out in my advantage. Unless of course there is some other tax i would have to pay which I am not aware of.
Apologies my knowledge of UK taxation system is so poor but all I am trying to do here is come up with the solution so i can buy a house with my better half. If i have to pay the increased stamp duty tax then having in mind my future property would be at 350k i would need to have 18k more in just SDT on top of the deposit which makes the whole purchase out of our reach.
If you know the resolutions to the above or have ideas that could help me then please share. Alternatively if you could recommend a good broker or a book about it if there is one it would be great.
The company i consider using as a purchaser of my flat is operating since 2010
thank you in advance
Jakub
I need some help with finding a way to buy a house but minimizing a wooping 18k in Stamp Duty Tax.
I have bought a single bed apartment over 2 years ago. Since then I have found a partner and we are thinking of moving in together. I have rented out my flat as it is too small for us both and in the meantime we have rented a house which we live in.
It is clear to me that paying 1300 a month in rent is a waste of money and it would make sense to pay that as a mortgage installments instead.
After talking to my broker I have realized then now I would be hit with the higher Stamp Duty which would be 3% for the first 125k then 5% for the following 125% and 8% for everything above 250k. I m not planning on buying a property worth more than 350k (that equates to 18k in SDT)
The issues I have:
1. the flat still isnt on a buy to let mortgage but treated as my living address - I suspect I need to change that ASAP
2. I would like to keep that property as it generates a positive cashflow so selling to a 3rd party wouldnt be ideal
3. I could sell it to my LTD company (but I am not sure how would that work - i suspect the company would have to take a mortgage itself and from researching that 3 years ago the deposit was about 40% back then?) The company has a renting properties profile apart from my main one already as I am renting on a minimal scale
4. I think selling it to my company under some reasonable deal would free me from the increased Stamp Duty on the new property as it would make me as a person buying a property as a primary residence
5. On the other hand I suspect company would have to pay its own Stamp Duty - the flat was worth 129k when i bought it so market value now around 140k i recon - i would lower the value possibly and sell at a loss at 124.999? and hopefully pay no tax as my limited company is buying the 1st property or pay 3% only? I wouldnt mind having the company paying the mortgage but if there is a need for personal guarantee than i could give it but i recon then it would influence my credit capabilities and score for my new mortgage.
6. My partner doesnt have a property at all but she doesnt have a deposit either. My broker was indicating to me that even if we bought it together which i would like to do it would still fall under 2nd property and the increased Stamp Duty Tax as I already have a flat.
7. Buying a property with my partner would I assume increase our credit capabilities and make it more appealing to the landers - we would have sign some sort of paperwork stating that all the deposit is mine but the mortgage payments are a responsibility of both of us.
The interesting points would be if my company while owing the flat can take for example amortization from it and treat mortgage payments as cost? if so then even paying the stamp duty tax now would in the long run work out in my advantage. Unless of course there is some other tax i would have to pay which I am not aware of.
Apologies my knowledge of UK taxation system is so poor but all I am trying to do here is come up with the solution so i can buy a house with my better half. If i have to pay the increased stamp duty tax then having in mind my future property would be at 350k i would need to have 18k more in just SDT on top of the deposit which makes the whole purchase out of our reach.
If you know the resolutions to the above or have ideas that could help me then please share. Alternatively if you could recommend a good broker or a book about it if there is one it would be great.
The company i consider using as a purchaser of my flat is operating since 2010
thank you in advance
Jakub
0
Comments
-
If you transfer your property to a company, it will be deemed to have occurred at it's open-market value rather than a figure of your choosing. And the 3% surcharge applies to companies even it's the companies first and only property. One individuals have access to the first-purchase standard rates."Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius0
-
You can't avoid it.
It's there entirely to put off people like you
0 -
Just to add - based on what you've posted above, I'd recommend an accountant does your personal tax returns for this year. Deadline for filling is 31 January.
The easy solution is to sell the property you no longer require."Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius0 -
polacoloco wrote: »Hi,
The issues I have:
1. the flat still isnt on a buy to let mortgage but treated as my living address - I suspect I need to change that ASAP
Apologies my knowledge of UK taxation system is so poor
Yes you have to sort that out with your mortgage lender. They may take a dim view.
Have you been complying with all your other legal duties as a landlord?
Have you been declaring the rental income to HMRC, if your knowledge of UK tax law is "so poor"?0 -
Hi thank you for your replies. Yes I have an accountant and I do declare my rental income.
I will keep looking maybe there is a way but still selling it to the company and paying full SDT would make me not own a property.
I need a meeting with the broker/accountant and decide then.
thank you again for the advise.0 -
:beer: I get what you say but the more i think about it the more it looks like it:
1. wont stop the big portfolio owners - as they have enough passive income to continue growing and the hit they ll take wont be as big as on an individual as me
2. it will prevent people from trying to build what for years was available eg. have your own home and a bit of extra income from having lets say 2 or 3 flats - that could pay for your hols once a year :rotfl:
Time to try to save 18k for the SDT0 -
polacoloco wrote: »:beer: I get what you say but the more i think about it the more it looks like it:
1. wont stop the big portfolio owners - as they have enough passive income to continue growing and the hit they ll take wont be as big as on an individual as me
2. it will prevent people from trying to build what for years was available eg. have your own home and a bit of extra income from having lets say 2 or 3 flats - that could pay for your hols once a year :rotfl:
Time to try to save 18k for the SDT
Why do you think Fergus Wilson, the UK's biggest landlord (in terms of number of properties owned, not physical size!) is selling off all of his BTLs? He's quitting the game. It's not just stamp duty, the whole taxation system for landlords will be changing quite drastically.0 -
It would likely be cheaper to sell the small flat, buy the new house, then buy another small flat or maybe a bigger one (with more income potential)later. Is there anything special about this one?
Otherwise, how many years rental profit will it take to recoup the £18k? Most likely 5 to 10? All that hassle work and expense in the hope of a capital gain on a small flat (so not much most likely)
Is it worth it? Have you done the maths to see if you will actually be making money0 -
Why do you think Fergus Wilson, the UK's biggest landlord (in terms of number of properties owned, not physical size!) is selling off all of his BTLs? He's quitting the game. It's not just stamp duty, the whole taxation system for landlords will be changing quite drastically.
Surely the UK's biggest landlord is incorporated and therefore continues as normal and is not affected by the new tax regime?It may sometimes seem like I can't spell, I can, I just can't type0 -
No - he is not incorporated. It would have been, and remains, very financially disadvantageous to incorporate - indeed it looks like only about £10k of property income is coming via a limited company.MyOnlyPost wrote: »Surely the UK's biggest landlord is incorporated and therefore continues as normal and is not affected by the new tax regime?
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/officers/srsWDTlnG0qG0yDgw1Is-Auy96w/appointments0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
