PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Landlord wants to evict me and move back in!

Options
14344454648

Comments

  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    mrginge wrote: »
    No, you are not right because nothing is black and white.
    Which is exactly the issue. Nothing is black and white, yet people have been advising OP to respond to his LL as if it is.

    GM said it as it is, if it went to court, it is likely (and therefore not certain) that the judge would rule in their favour.

    BUT that means OP going court, and then crossing his fingers. He had an opportunity to take an offer, I really hope his decision not to wasn't based on what he was told here.

    Some people thrive on stressful situations, maybe it is the case of OP, but clearly not the case of his wife. I feel sorry for her to be caught in this position.
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    FBaby wrote: »
    Which is exactly the issue. Nothing is black and white, yet people have been advising OP to respond to his LL as if it is.

    GM said it as it is, if it went to court, it is likely (and therefore not certain) that the judge would rule in their favour.

    BUT that means OP going court, and then crossing his fingers. He had an opportunity to take an offer, I really hope his decision not to wasn't based on what he was told here.

    Some people thrive on stressful situations, maybe it is the case of OP, but clearly not the case of his wife. I feel sorry for her to be caught in this position.

    With respect, I'm not sure you've quite grasped the point of this forum.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 18 February 2017 at 6:04PM
    What I don't understand about this 'clause' is am I right in thinking a break clause works both ways. LL and tenant can end early.

    With this clause the LL seems to relying on its only one way, just the LL can end early, surely that can't be right/be allowed?
    Post 470 above:
    A Break Clause is generally considered to be unfair, and unenforcible, if iit does not provide equal rights to end the tenancy to both parties.

    But of course that relies on the decision of a court, and judges' decisions cannot be taken for granted.

    However it is likely a judge would not consider this a fair Break Clause.
    This time for additonal clarity I've underlined the relevant word.

    As Miss S (finally) correctly pointed out
    A[n] unilateral break clause isn't explicitly forbidden by any statute.
    so it is up to a judge's interpretaion of (unfair) consumer law.
  • i'm eagerly awaiting an update on this. somehow i've become very invested in the outcome!
    CCCC #33: £42/£240
    DFW: £4355/£4405
  • molerat
    molerat Posts: 34,595 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 21 February 2017 at 9:46PM
    Surely, in the absence of any specific break clause, if the LL is relying on clause 50 in the agreement it must be sub clause c) as the other 2 don't apply and he has already stated why he wants possession. In this particular case "any other ground provided in the act" would be S8 G1 which cannot be used in the fixed term.
  • karcher
    karcher Posts: 2,069 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Any update on this OP?
    'I'm sinking in the quicksand of my thought
    And I ain't got the power anymore'
  • CM66
    CM66 Posts: 602 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts
    Come on OP - dont leave us hanging!!
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    rentmekid wrote: »
    please don't encourage him, I'm glad he's gone

    Must've had a profound impact on you in the 8 days you've been a member... :)
  • MobileSaver
    MobileSaver Posts: 4,341 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Guest101 wrote: »
    Must've had a profound impact on you in the 8 days you've been a member... :)

    Looking at some of rentmekid's other posts, seems they're just a wannabe troll; is it half-term?
    Every generation blames the one before...
    Mike + The Mechanics - The Living Years
  • Any update on this ?
    baldly going on...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.