We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
my buy-to-let dream cost me everything
Comments
-
Melissa, I said the person must be a RAVING Tory. You sound like a nice, shiny green, David Cameron sort of Tory.And if, you know, your history...0
-
dixie_dean wrote: »Melissa, I said the person must be a RAVING Tory. You sound like a nice, shiny green, David Cameron sort of Tory.
Would that be a Quentin Davies sort of Tory too?0 -
eco-friendly wrote: ».....Back in 1989 when we had the REAL crash the only people that benefited were Landlords , YUP ! BTLers. Around 60.000 people lost their homes, and many lost their jobs also , a lot of those repossessed properties were auctioned off at " bargain prices " ! and the crazy thing was ,some families found themselves re-housed in properties bought at auction round the corner from were they originally stayed, but now on state benefits. Appalling that the goverment allowed this to happen, but they did.....
"The government allowed this to happen" One, I think the markets did it, something the government can not control. Two, where would you like the people who were repossessed to live? You want a law saying you can't rent within 1/2 a mile of where you had your house repossessed? Three, please outline how you would legislate to prevent this.A house isn't a home without a cat.
Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.
I have writer's block - I can't begin to tell you about it.
You told me again you preferred handsome men but for me you would make an exception.
It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression when you lose yours.0 -
Brave, cash rich people do well out of recessions.
Holders of assets and those that lose their jobs do badly.0 -
-
BobProperty wrote: »"The government allowed this to happen" One, I think the markets did it, something the government can not control. Two, where would you like the people who were repossessed to live? You want a law saying you can't rent within 1/2 a mile of where you had your house repossessed? Three, please outline how you would legislate to prevent this.
Well, it was the US and UK governments who pursued a policy of low interest rates, increasing the money supply and allowing less regulation of money markets so in large part, they bear a great deal of responsibility for the way things have gone in the last 5-6 years.
They did it precisely to create a boom and keep it going for as long as possible. The last time the UK boom looked like flagging, mid 2005, the BoE delivered an out of the blue interest rate cut which certainly got things moving for a bit longer. Unfortunately by staving off an inevitable recession they just make things worse for when it all does go pear shaped.
My guess is that Brown will make sure that everything is done to keep the illusion of a strong economy/housing market going until at least after the next election. Once he's re-elected and safe for five years he might actually do something to tackle the underlying problems.--
Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.0 -
My guess is that Brown will make sure that everything is done to keep the illusion of a strong economy/housing market going until at least after the next election. Once he's re-elected and safe for five years he might actually do something to tackle the underlying problems.
That is my fear:eek:RENTING? Have you checked to see that your landlord has permission from their mortgage lender to rent the property? If not, you could be thrown out with very little notice.
Read the sticky on the House Buying, Renting & Selling board.0 -
Ah the power of the crash.
I've just bought a block of 20 flats with existing tenants in Germany. The rent yield is over 20% (we will get it to 30% by improving some of the flats).
It has a football stadium sized foot print of land and it's in a town that is now booming - believe it or not Poles are invading the place, sounds familiar!
The price I paid......... have a guess?
£50,000. The same property was sold for £400,000 just prior to the German property crash in 1996.
As I say, the power of sentiment is breathtaking.
Barnard Marcus auctions in London last week had many new build repossessed flats for sale. A typical example:
Nottingham - flat 3, Brook Court bought for £139000 in November 2005.
WHAT PRICE DO YOU THINK THE AUCTION ACHIEVED.........?
It did'nt!!!
The reserve of £70,000 was'nt even achieved.
This is one of many such examples in just that one auction.
BUT PROPERTY ALWAYS GOES UP - Galliard Homes are still building such developments so it must be true...........0 -
£50,000. The same property was sold for £400,000 just prior to the German property crash in 1996.
As I say, the power of sentiment is breathtaking.
....
BUT PROPERTY ALWAYS GOES UP - Galliard Homes are still building such developments so it must be true...........
Ah, but in good old Blighty property always goes up. Who knows what way it works over in those weird continental societies.
Oh, and we don't have any sub-prime here either. No sir. That's just those irresponsible yanks who of course are also responsible for any problems our debt industry might be having.
Nope, Britain has a strong sustainable economy with a thriving property market built on sound fundamentals. :rolleyes:--
Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.0 -
eco-friendly wrote: »O danny boy..........................
Back in 1989 when we had the REAL crash the only people that benefited were Landlords , YUP ! BTLers.
Many BTL'ers are on interest only mortgages for obvious reasons. The recent run of rate rises has wiped out their profits and many are now subsidising their tenants!
OK, but it's a long term investment I hear you say. Well. I hope you're not too busy for the next 10-15 years... because that's the kind of downturn that could be on the cards (look at Japan). Interest rates will be lowered allowing BTL'ers to claw back some of their losses, but will they take the bait or cut and run before they go into negative equity on a property/ies that they haven't paid a penny off? It's too little too late....there's only one way to go now!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards