We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
is this true
Comments
-
If you already have received a claim from the court then the clock is ticking for you to deal with this.the only paper work I have is from bwlegal and the court.....
Read up in the newbies faq thread on how to deal with a court claim, and follow the links there to other sources of advice on court claims.
(If you have a claim in hand now, then you need to send in an acknowledgement of claim which buys you an extra 14 days to send in a defence)0 -
They are telling him/her that he/she didn't reply to their request for the driver's details, and now under POFA he/she is liable (as far as they are concerned).Reference made to this ..... "Got a reply back saying that I am responsible as the rk because I did not reply to they early letters"
Total rubbish, what on earth has that got to do with not replying to letters. They have the keepers name and not the driver they were after, so the keeper was not the driver, that's why they try it on quoting the Loake case
As posted, the OP asked if that was true (that they could chase the keeper), and replies (apart from yours!) have tried to explain that it could be true if they have been compliant with POFA0 -
-
have read on newbies thread that excel don not comply with pofa is this correct and if so then they can only persue the driver0
-
have read on newbies thread that excel don not comply with pofa is this correct and if so then they can only persue the driver
you tell us if they complied? questions were asked , but you did not answer , do you have a papertrail to check dates of letters etcSave a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
Yes - true - but if you read other BW Legal Excel threads you will see you can't write a 'single line defence in text-speak with no punctuation'. Harsh but true, I am being honest here. If you are genuine and want to fight this you will need to put in some time and effort.have read on newbies thread that excel don not comply with pofa is this correct and if so then they can only persue the driver
You must read other Excel defences and you need to read the NEWBIES thread section headed 'Small Claim?' and those links.
Come back when you have acknowledged the claim on MCOL using the password on the front page of the claim form. Leave the defence blank and then come straight back here and show us the draft defence - using numbered paragraphs like you see on other Excel threads, a detailed defence that is relevant to your case.
Copy stuff from other defences by all means but only if it makes sense for your case.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
If they do not use POFA, and ask the RK to pay, it is ikely that they have breached DP Regs and their Kadoe contract. Smart were taken to court recently and chickened.
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/smart-parking-settle-out-of-court-for.htmlYou never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
have said above have no paper work have sent court papers back so I will wait and see what happens next thanks0
-
have said above have no paper work have sent court papers back so I will wait and see what happens next thanks
first post "received a letter from bwlegal in december about a pcn that happened in 2014 asking for £245,00 wrote back and told them I was not the driver and can prove this Got a reply back saying that I am responsible has the rk because I did not reply to they early letters so I have replyed back saying I will defend this"
have you received and replied to a MCOL court action , or are you still playing royal mail ping pong with B+W ?
if you have replied to a county court letter , WHAT have you written ?Save a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
