We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

New taxes on BTLs - hill of beans?

1235710

Comments

  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    jdw2000 wrote: »
    5 years to break even?

    But that doesn't factor in the primary reason for the BTL: capital appreciation.

    Solely banking on capital appreciation is not wise from either a business or investment point of view. You need a BTL that can at least wipe its own face.
  • jdw2000
    jdw2000 Posts: 418 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 100 Posts
    Pixie5740 wrote: »
    Solely banking on capital appreciation is not wise from either a business or investment point of view. You need a BTL that can at least wipe its own face.

    £1000 pm in rental income, and £350pm in mortgage costs is a better margin than I was running my own BTL on for many years.


    What's your definition of wiping it's face?
  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Her gross rental yield isn't particularly attractive < 5% and as you've already had your own BTL you know that there are more costs than just mortgage interest. Add to that the fact that your friend has borrowed 100% of the purchase price and that makes her very vulnerable to interest rate changes.

    Each to their own.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    jdw2000 wrote: »
    Those number are broadly correct.

    Apparently the interest-only mortgage actually costs about £350 pm, not £400. It's 2.29% or around that figure. But I don't suppose that changes the bigger picture greatly.

    I suspect that rate has come with some substantial fees and is not a lifetime tracker.

    how long is it 2.29% and what is the follow on rate?

    I see this going T*Ts up when the remortgage in X years gets refused.
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 13 January 2017 at 2:22PM
    jdw2000 wrote: »
    £1000 pm in rental income, and £350pm in mortgage costs is a better margin than I was running my own BTL on for many years.

    What's your definition of wiping it's face?

    Its more than £350 because there also the extra £75k residential mortgage shes got. Thats maybe another £150 month. Tax would be another £1,000/year or £80/month. So its now up to £600/month.

    The £400 left over from the £1,000 can start paying off the £10k SDLT.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    jdw2000 wrote: »
    £1000 pm in rental income, and £350pm in mortgage costs is a better margin than I was running my own BTL on for many years.


    What's your definition of wiping it's face?

    What about the interest on the other £75k borrowed on th emain residence?


    can't type fast enough.
  • tim123456789
    tim123456789 Posts: 1,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Nearly all LLs make profit? Otherwise it's just a big gamble on capital gains, and people aren't THAT stupid.


    but it's not a huge profit


    When I did it, I (foolishly) self managed and after costs got about 3K per year in taxable income but spent an awful lot of time looking after it.


    I calculated I could earn just as much, with less aggro, working the same extra hours as overtime in my day job.


    And then I made a 40K capital gain when I sold up.


    The profit's all in the capital gain that you make, not the year on year income.


    And, like I previously said, despite people cautioning otherwise (OK perhaps I did go back a few years too many) there appears to be no end to this upward trend in market prices.


    I don't like the way that, seemingly deliberate, restrictions in availability are causing this never ending increase in prices, but intervention to cause reductions is political toxic
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    edited 13 January 2017 at 2:36PM
    OK closest I could find is virgin money BTL.
    2.29% 2y tracker, followon 4.74% £995 fees

    might even have with £500 cashback.

    http://uk.virginmoney.com/mortgages/find/Find-A-Mortgage/2yr_everyday_tracker_cashback_8ftn?buyertype=buytolet/
    not as bad as I thought,

    do they know the deposit is borrowed money?

    Virgin critera on BTL is 145% cover at 5.5% so needs £14k rental
  • tim123456789
    tim123456789 Posts: 1,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Ulfar wrote: »
    It also doesn't factor in a chancellor in the future reducing or eliminating the 20% tax credit on mortgage interest payments. We all know how the current government is treating tax credits.


    The technical terminology is that this is not a "tax credit", it is a business expense.


    That they have restricted it to only being usable against the standard rate, does not change that


    tim
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.