We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Credit card refund refused after unfulfilled contract.

13»

Comments

  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    wealdroam wrote: »
    Is The Financial Ombudsman Service able to consider a "complaint" about a credit card company refusing to provide a refund because the "service provider" has become insolvent?

    Surely it doesn't matter who that service provider is, does it?

    If an additional card holder has the right to chargeback then OP could go to ombudsman about the card company. They could also appeal to the ombudsman about the banks decision not to pay out on a section 75 claim due to them not being the main cardholder but I have reason to believe the ombudsman would reject the section 75 claim also as they have previously stated the required chain (debtor > creditor > supplier) is broken when considering additional cardholders.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If an additional card holder has the right to chargeback then OP could go to ombudsman about the card company.
    That's not what you were referring to at post#9, of course.
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    That's not what you were referring to at post#9, of course.

    No it was not - #9 was (for the sake of clarity) referring to making a complaint about the company who sold him the product rather than the card company/creditor who financed it.

    But as I said in my earlier post (#6), I'm not entirely sure how fruitful complaining to the ombudsman would prove if the company have collapsed.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I'm not entirely sure how fruitful complaining to the ombudsman would prove if the company have collapsed.
    It won't be fruitful at all if the thread is (as I suspected all along) about a failed Claims Management Company. It's a different regulator (Legal Ombudsman rather than the Financial one) for a start.

    No real point carrying on with this discussion until the OP clarifies exactly what was actually purchased.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.