case thrown out of court

andyandpaulasmum

it just says the claim is struck out

borgbaiter

hi

surely it gives a reason?
it isnt just stayed is it?


Borgbaiter

Edinburghlass_2

I've merged these two threads as we have already been down this road trying to find out the exact background to the OP's case.

nickmack

andyandpaulasmum wrote: »

it just says the claim is struck out

Can you give the exact wording please? Otherwise it's very difficult to work out what has been said.

andyandpaulasmum

it says before judge murdoch sitting at northampton county court on 14 august without hearing it is ordered that the case is struck out at the bottom of letter it says note ..a party affected by this ordermay under rule 3.3 (5) apply to have it set aside varied or stayed such a party must apply under rule 23.3 within 14days of service of this order i never did anything is it too late to get my money now please advise

Edinburghlass_2

andyandpaulasmum wrote: »

i paid court fees and recieved acknowledgment of service it stated that the bank was defending all ithe claim and heard nothing else until i recieved a leetter from court saying notice of judgement rejected giving the reason a bar on judgement/enforcement is in place please advise me

andyandpaulasmum wrote: »

it says before judge murdoch sitting at northampton county court on 14 august without hearing it is ordered that the case is struck out at the bottom of letter it says note ..a party affected by this ordermay under rule 3.3 (5) apply to have it set aside varied or stayed such a party must apply under rule 23.3 within 14days of service of this order i never did anything is it too late to get my money now please advise

So what is the reason for it being struck out?

a11waysindebt

The reason is this I believe.

under rule 3.3 (5) apply to have it set aside varied or stayed such a party must apply under rule 23.3

No idea what it means though.

a11waysindebt

Google the rule above then go to first on list.

Edinburghlass_2

a11waysindebt wrote: »

The reason is this I believe.

under rule 3.3 (5) apply to have it set aside varied or stayed such a party must apply under rule 23.3

No idea what it means though.

That means that the OP could have appealed against the case being struck out but the time scale has now passed for doing this.

What we need to know is the exact wording of the letter as now we seem to have conflicting information and if the letter says it has been struck out there must be a reason for this.

siowenson

Wow, this thread aint half being strung out.

Please, please, please, just type the letter onto this thread word for word.