We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Legal rights when a housemate leaves key outside
Comments
- 
            
 Do we really want to get side-tracked into a legal discussion that's unrelated to the OP's poblem of the locksmith charge?anotheruser wrote: »Ah ha, but going on what people say about similar things, that person had no right to enter that property and thus, it is still a crime surely?
 But OK - it may be a crime. We don't know. Was anything stolen?
 It was certainly not "breaking and entering", nor was it "criminal damage". If something was stolen (we have no evidence of this) it would probobly be "burglary".
 If nothing was stolen, then there's no crime, though a civil "trespass" occurred.
 Did the culprit keep the key after entering, or return it to where it was found? There might have been theft of the key. We don't know.0
- 
            
- 
            
 Ah! Oops! Skim reading.....Norman_Castle wrote: »Here's a clue.
 someone broke into the house stealing several items.
 I still take issue with the 'broke into' but yes, theft is obviously theft.0
- 
            As has been said above, you're all equally liable - and all liable for the full amount if people don't pay.
 That aside, that's just "who can be taken to court to pay it if nobody does".
 As you all KNOW who did it .... you need to all lean on her to get her to pay it. If she's that stupid/careless/unaware then she's a snowflake and her parents will pay it for her if you let her know you're serious about not letting her get away with it.0
- 
            but a snowflake is a thing of beauty is it not?0
- 
            
- 
            Just a reminder too that to claim for a new lock or theft from your Insurer/s requires that there is 'forcible or violent entry' in most cases. Even more likely where a property is shared as Insurers don't want to pay for flatmates swiping each others goods!I may not have thanked you but I meant to, honest!0
- 
            Unless a bunch of keys was left outside (why , anyway?) surely just the lock with the stolen key would need changing.0
- 
            Sympathies; when we were first burgled- over 40 years ago - it was because we were equally young and clueless- didn't even have window-locks, nor, of course insurance! The good news was we don't have much worth stealing, but they took all that was; so it was a hard lesson learned.Hi,
 (we have been) charged a total of £300 to change the locks, I was away...are the whole house obliged to pay?... I don't have any money (for) my share
 Irrespective of whether it's fair and whether you are individually or "severally" (jointly) liable, or whether the locks could have been changed cheaper as a DIY job (not that I'd trust anyone under 25 with a chisel, drill and screwdriver, lol), it's reasonable, in fact helpful, that the landlord has promptly changed 'em (presumably because one of your co-tenants reported the incident?) And equally reasonable that the LL charge you for the foolishness rtaher than swallow the cost themselves?
 So you are where you are.
 If you don't pay up, presumably the landlord will simply take it out of the deposit - especially as they have the evidence of having to lash out £300 in the form of a receipt? And/or simply evict this bunch of tenants at the end of the 1st 6 months and find tenants who are less hopeless and know how to lock a door?
 Sorry to sound harsh, but the LL won't want to get involved in arbitrating on who pays how much.
 So its down to you as a group to negotiate as suggested above, and, if as you say ....Hi,
 ...she isn't being very nice about the situation and I don't have any money (for) my share
 All you can do is employ the classic American Amish technique of "shunning"!
 http://www.exploring-amish-country.com/amish-shunning.html
 Good luck; at least you have youth (and hopefully, good health, family and good friends) on your side!0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
          
          
         