We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Vehicle Control Services - Stopped on a roadway where stopping is prohibited
Comments
-
What precedent? Whilst county court judgments may be persuasive, especially if laid down by a senior circuit judge, they don't set precedents.0
-
For what exactly?if the claimant - VCS or BW Legal - do not file a claim could a person who receives a parking charge notice letter issue a claim straight away?0 -
the parking prankster site states:
"The case of VCS v Phillip C9DP2D6C has already established that a charge on this site for stopping is not valid, and that a claim for a data protection breach in the region of £250 might be awarded."
Thus, if a person receives an invoice from CVS for stopping on Liverpool Business Park, is it not logical for such a person to claim for DPA breach and distress when there was clearly no reasonable cause to obtain the defendant's personal information0 -
Could do, but in the small claims court it's entirely up to each individual judge. The above case does not set a precedent, but would be useful evidence to include in any defendant's submissions.Thus, if a person receives an invoice from CVS for stopping on Liverpool Business Park, is it not logical for such a person to claim for DPA breach and distress when there was clearly no reasonable cause to obtain the defendant's personal information
We've seen judges make polar opposite judgments in what appear to be very similar cases.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
