Swagbucking into 2017

mjm3346

holidaysforme wrote: »

I've just got 100 for searching for China tea sets!! Had to look twice,- thought it said 10.

Didn't think you could get more than 20 for a search:D

Will make up for not getting any surveys for the last couple of days.

According to SB

You can win multiple SB every day. Every search is a chance to win! SB can be won in denominations ranging from 1 - 1,000. Remember, winning is random!

(I've had 100 a few times but never more than that - but still over 2,000 since 01/12/16)

snowy79

I think the most i have got on a search is about 20SB, never knew you could get 1000! Wonder how often that happens.

Does anyone ever get SB from installing apps on their phone? Like the app a day one or installing a game and opening it? I have tried a few but they never credit. Not sure what i am doing wrong? Also if it doesnt credit, how can you prove that you installed it when raising a ticket?

Wizzbang

Hi all,

It's a bad day today, but this offer credited instantly for me on AdGate, even with an adblocker installed and ahem fake info. HTH

Ariel Tester
Ariel Tester
+20SB
Description: Get & Test NEW biological ARIEL tabs! Confirms Instantly.

Requirements: Register with valid information. Fake information will not be credited.

That helped me limp to target with the apps. Enjoy the rest of your Sunday evening

sonicology

mjm3346 wrote: »

According to SB "Every search is a chance to win! Remember, winning is random!"

Yeah I'm calling BS on that, or the "every search" part at least (I do believe that winning is random).

Seems that there's a time limit between wins or a minimum number of searches or something before you can trigger a win; I've never had a search win and then another straight after, which if it were truly random on every search the odds are I would have had several times by now.

Didn't mean to appear as though I was calling you out by the way; I appreciate your post, it's Swagbucks wording I take issue with.

Scarlett

sonicology wrote: »

Yeah I'm calling BS on that, or the "every search" part at least (I do believe that winning is random).

Seems that there's a time limit between wins or a minimum number of searches or something before you can trigger a win; I've never had a search win and then another straight after, which if it were truly random on every search the odds are I would have had several times by now.

Didn't mean to appear as though I was calling you out by the way; I appreciate your post, it's Swagbucks wording I take issue with.

I agree! I noticed that everyone was complaining about not having any search wins the other day and then all of a sudden, everyone seemed to get one at about the same time (including me, but I didn't post). I don't think it's as random as they are making out.

thisone

Scarlett wrote: »

I agree! I noticed that everyone was complaining about not having any search wins the other day and then all of a sudden, everyone seemed to get one at about the same time (including me, but I didn't post). I don't think it's as random as they are making out.

Would explain why we can sometimes get search wins from other peoples posted search terms!

emg

Well, I just got a 4 SB search win, time to test the theory?

thisone

emg wrote: »

Well, I just got a 4 SB search win, time to test the theory?

Not exactly conclusive, took 4 or 5 searches to get 4sb, I'd already done at least that many before!

Merlot1975

emg wrote: »

Well, I just got a 4 SB search win, time to test the theory?

Funny enough, I just got a 4SB search win too

Jenna_Appleseed

Scarlett wrote: »

Just got screened out of a survey because I hadn't spent over £2,500 on luxury products over the last twelve months (the lowest option). Am I wrong in thinking that anyone who spends over £2,500 on luxury products in a year probably wouldn't be filling out online surveys for a few pence a throw??

Hmmm maybe they are though... maybe that's how they've got so much spare cash to splash!

or they're desperately doing swagbucks surveys to try and pay off their credit card bills :eek: