We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Compact camera with good, shallow depth of field

Hi guys....and guy-esses!

I am after a compact camera with a good, shallow depth of field at a cheap(ish) and cheerful price point.

I already own decent Canon DSLR camera, but I don't want to be lugging that around with me on holiday!

Any recommendations will be appreciated :)

Comments

  • knightstyle
    knightstyle Posts: 7,394 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I have been using a Panasonic Lumix Tz55 for a couple of years and am impressed with the range of settings it has many preset for different shots plus the ability to alter speed and aperture as needed. Thee are more modern versions around but I am happy wit my older one.
  • daveyjp
    daveyjp Posts: 14,127 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Have a look at used Fuji x series. Full speed and aperture control.
  • EssexExile
    EssexExile Posts: 6,595 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The TZ range all seem to have an f3.3 which is ok. A quick Google suggests that to get better than that you'll be spending lots.
    Tall, dark & handsome. Well two out of three ain't bad.
  • boliston
    boliston Posts: 3,012 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    Sensor size is the thing that governs depth of field but larger sensor normally means higher price. I'd say fuji x if you can afford it.
  • mksysb
    mksysb Posts: 441 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    As you are already a Canon user, why not have a look the Canon eos m10? It's the size of a compact, but with a larger sensor, and full manual controls. It's also on a special offer from canon with £30 cash back. In the future, you could even get an adaptor and use your existing lenses.
  • Thanks guys!
  • sysadmin
    sysadmin Posts: 205 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Take a look at either the Lumix LX100 (f1.8 aperture) or the Sony RX100 mk2 upwards

    But yes your talking at £400 up
  • lemontart
    lemontart Posts: 6,037 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 8 January 2017 at 6:30PM
    boliston wrote: »
    Sensor size is the thing that governs depth of field but larger sensor normally means higher price. I'd say fuji x if you can afford it.

    No no no ! it is governed by aperture, focal lenght and shooting distance.

    http://ketteringsnappers.freeforums.net/thread/20/depth-field?page=1&scrollTo=2283
    I am responsible me, myself and I alone I am not the keeper others thoughts and words.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.