We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Amazon being fair?
Comments
-
How can Amazon send a replacement if they don't have a replacement to send?
Life is full of disappointments, in the scheme of things this could probably be classed as minor.
Get your money back and wait for the next sale.0 -
steampowered wrote: »Would it not be possible to wait until Amazon have the same item in stock, if they are expecting another delivery?
This would have been offered if delivery was imminent. Obviously, it wasn't.
If the product was out of stock completely (as is likely with a toy for Xmas) Amazon wares will bear the disclaimer, "We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock".
In such instances, only a full refund will be offered and, of course, the OP is under no obligation to buy from the third party retailer charging a higher price.POPPYOSCAR wrote: »When I bought an item on lightening deals and it arrived with a part missing they sent me another one and organised collection of the faulty one at the same time.
Have they changed their policy now?
Obviously, the item you bought was in stock for you to exchange.0 -
Moneyineptitude wrote: »Clearly, Amazon are not "scamming" anyone. The item was damaged in transit, it's not deliberately "faulty".
Really?
I thought the OP reported a part to be missing.
Not sure how you managed to translate that into "damaged in transit".0 -
-
Moneyineptitude wrote: »My reading was that it was broken rather than missing. My bad.
Doesn't change anything I said about this not being a "scam", however.
Long thread now going in circles covering the same ground over and over.
Clearly says in opening post " When my son opened it on Christmas Day, there was a big piece of the house missing."
I don't see what possible "scam" the OP could be attempting - he just wants the missing part or a replacement. Or are you insinuating that the OP/ their child has damaged the part?0 -
I don't see what possible "scam" the OP could be attempting - he just wants the missing part or a replacement. Or are you insinuating that the OP/ their child has damaged the part?
The "scam" conversation (in the earlier part of the thread) was in response to someone who accused Amazon of scamming the customer.
I have not claimed anyone was scammed or indeed scamming.Moneyineptitude wrote: »Doesn't change anything I said about this NOT being a "scam",0 -
No one has suggested the OP is scamming. Someone else suggested Amazon might be scamming - which certainly doesn't appear to be the case.0
-
Moneyineptitude wrote: »Now who isn't reading? :eek:
Then I apologise.
I don't believe you're correct that Amazon only stock toys for Christmas. Children have birthdays too and these occur throughout the year. I certainly purchase toys from Amazon year round with good availability and competitive prices.0 -
I don't believe you're correct that Amazon only stock toys for Christmas.
It's also possible that the toy may go on to be not offered again at all, this at Amazon's discretion usually based on sales.0 -
steampowered wrote: »Would it not be possible to wait until Amazon have the same item in stock, if they are expecting another delivery?
I just want to pick up on this, as it is a common myth that circulates on MSE. Although Amazon trades through a Luxembourg company, a court action against them can be brought in the UK and would be heard in the consumer's nearest county court.
That is what EU law requires, and it is also reflected in Amazon's T&Cs which state "you may bring a claim to enforce your consumer protection rights in connection with these Conditions of Use in Luxembourg or in the EU country in which you live".
I wouldn't say its ever been mentioned on here enough to be regarded as a myth being circulated, let alone a common one.
If anything, the common myth being circulated regarding amazon seems to be that they're a UK company and therefore need to abide by UK law.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards