We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Do I need critical illness cover now

2»

Comments

  • ThinkingOutLoud_2
    ThinkingOutLoud_2 Posts: 1,402 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary
    edited 5 January 2017 at 1:03AM
    So I agree with much of what is said.

    I wonder if you could revisit why you bought the cover in the first place. So if as may be the case, it was to provide an income if you were not working or perhaps support a child, it sounds like you are no longer needing to work and maybe your children (if any have flown the nest).

    So it is time to evaluate your needs now. If you fell seriously ill now, would that bring costs your pension would not cover as inferred already? As your pensions sounds just adequate, this is worth thinking about.

    But, maybe you do not need the same level of cover.

    Hope this helps.
    I am just thinking out loud - nothing I say should be relied upon!
    I do however reserve the right to be correct by accident.
  • csgohan4
    csgohan4 Posts: 10,600 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    In an ideal world, if you can afford it, get Critical illness, income protection and whole life insurance.




    All that would likely be a good chunk of what you pay your mortgage lender.
    "It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"

    G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP
  • jackyann
    jackyann Posts: 3,433 Forumite
    I can just tell you what we did and why, which may help.
    Our main income earner was self employed, so we took out an insurance which acted as life & critical illness cover, and as a savings pot which we cashed in at retirement.

    As we are retired, our income is not dependent on our health

    Our attitude is that we need to have savings for personal care and the incidental expenses associated with illness. It is better value to do it this way rather than pay out on insurance.

    We do not need private health care as we would always choose NHS care and have no-one depending on us (as for instance in the past we would have wanted to choose and be sure of an operation date). Even should you wish to have private health care cover, there is some argument for doing this by saving rather than insurance (you need to do your sums)

    Hope that helps
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.