We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Out Of The Country But Courier Says I Signed

Hi,

Thanks for reading! I guess this has been discussed before but I can't find any concrete information regarding my rights and I am so stressed out. Any help and advice would be gratefully received.

I'll start by saying I'm in Tobago. I'm not returning home until next week so I thought I'd be smart and do my Xmas shopping online, having it all delivered to my Mum's house (but addressed to me).

I purchased a foot stool from a retailer in Salisbury on Dec 5th with an online shop. I received an order confirmation email after paying via Paypal. The email said the usual thank yous, order number and 'we'll be in touch soon'. So I was satisfied that the order was placed and waited patiently for a dispatch notification.

On Wednesday I decided to email the retailer as I had not received a dispatch notification and no parcel.had been received by my Mum. The retailer, to my surprise, responded within hours to tell me that the parcel was delivered at 1.30pm on December 7th and signed for by myself. I'll reiterate now that I'm in Tobago.

Further emails to the retailer explaining this strange set of circumstances and confirming that the item has not been received have led to a response of 'we dont know what to suggest other than some detective work at home' follower by 'we're jealous that you're in Tobago'.

Needless to say, I'm pretty mad that they're not taking this more seriously. I paid via Paypal and I know I can open a claim there but from a bit of googling it seems unlikely that they'll help me because somebody somewhere has decided that I've signed for this delivery. Is this true? Does the fact that I'm not in the country have any bearing on this do you think? I've never experienced anything other than the usual little hiccups with online retailers and this has really shocked me. It was the most expensive present I've bought this Xmas and I thought twice before placing the order. I'm really upset that someone somewhere has decided to try and do me out of this gift.

I should add that my Mum lives in a large farm house with no neighbours so the parcel can't have been left with somebody else. She has an outbuilding where couriers are accustomed to leaving parcels when nobody is in, and even if it was a courier that had not visited before, the outbuilding is the only dry place for them to leave a parcel. Having said that, she doesn't work and was home all day on the 6th, 7th and 8th of December, during which time she had no deliveries.

If anyone has any advice the I'd be so grateful. Thank you in advance and Merry Christmas!

Comments

  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Try paypal and see what they say - try providing proof that you are out of the country so could not have signed for it.

    In future, try and avoid using paypal and paying direct by debit or credit card (if the item is over £100, use credit card). You have chargeback protection with debit & credit cards and purchases made by credit card that are over £100 (even if you only pay £5 by credit card) are covered by section 75 of the consumer credit act - which makes your card company jointly liable with the retailer.

    Paypal can break the chain required for section 75 claims - not always though, it depends on the transaction specifics and whether they're acting as an acquirer for the merchant or not.

    Perhaps also message the retailer and remind them that under both the consumer rights act and consumer contract regulations, risk does not pass until the goods have come into the physical possession of you or someone identified by you as being authorised to receive the goods. That - as that has not happened yet - the goods remain at their risk and that they cannot make you liable for negligence of their third party supplier (courier).

    That is providing the courier was one the retailer offered/chose and not one you contracted yourself.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • bris
    bris Posts: 10,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You don't need to sign for it, the fact they have a signature which shows delivery is enough to reject the claim.


    Despite what's written above the goods being delivered to the address is enough to fulfil the retailers obligations as the law considers it delivered.
  • timjim
    timjim Posts: 128 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    But the signature is supposedly the OP's and he/she is in Tobago. Therefore they have no proof of delivery
  • timjim wrote: »
    But the signature is supposedly the OP's and he/she is in Tobago. Therefore they have no proof of delivery



    Courier's deliver to addresses and not specific people. If my wife signs my name at the delivery address does that mean I can claim non delivery?
  • steampowered
    steampowered Posts: 6,176 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 16 December 2016 at 7:59PM
    Let the retailer know that you are not happy and make them investigate with the courier. The first step is for them to investigate it properly rather than fobbing you off.

    I think you would need to be clear that the parcel was not signed for by you or your mum (i.e. presumably it was stolen).

    Maybe they can get a copy of the signature, so you can see who appears to have signed it?
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 16 December 2016 at 6:39PM
    bris wrote: »
    You don't need to sign for it, the fact they have a signature which shows delivery is enough to reject the claim.


    Despite what's written above the goods being delivered to the address is enough to fulfil the retailers obligations as the law considers it delivered.

    Any statute or relevant case law to support that? Heres mine:

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/section/29/enacted
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/3134/regulation/43/made


    Why would they draft the law to specifically say physical possession of the person if what they wanted was for it to pass on signature or delivery to premises.

    Judges sometimes have to interpret what a phrase might mean. But I really don't think that the phrasing there leaves any interpretation for what you're claiming, especially given it specifically says physical possession and not just possession.

    It may be quicker, cheaper and overall more convenient for them not to insist on ID at delivery, but that is their choice & therefore their risk - it is entirely within their control and entirely outwith the consumers control.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.