Private Parking Appeals Ltd

Quentin

Why you asking me? You know the answer don't you?

logician

Quentin wrote: »

Why you asking me?

No reason - you just seem very keen to give your opinion as if you "know" facts just from reading the comments on this thread alone.

Quentin

You say "no reason"??? Very strange!


What odds is it to you?? Why do you ask in the first place when you know the answer?? Unless you have an agenda?? Nooooo. Perish the thought. Sorry I mentioned it.

pappa_golf

Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 97

perhaps you need more info before commenting

logician

Quentin wrote: »

You say "no reason"??? Very strange!


What odds is it to you?? Why do you ask in the first place when you know the answer?? Unless you have an agenda?? Nooooo. Perish the thought. Sorry I mentioned it.

"Very strange" response back from you Quentin, given I made a reasonable comment to you was the basis of your comment on "known facts", "guesswork" or "supposition."

pappa_golf wrote: »

Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 97

perhaps you need more info before commenting

Why does anyone need more info before posting on a thread? Surely that is the idea of a forum for people to comment on threads and posts?

Lamilad

you just seem very keen to give your opinion

No one seems more keen to give their opinion on a post involving PPA than you, logi.... Why is that?

Quentin

Coupon-mad wrote: »

What happened?

Did you check reviews anywhere first? Just as you would check hotels on TripAdvisor, I always check company reviews on something like Trust Pilot.

The problem for anyone consulting review sites (or forums) to check them out is that they (try to) gag their clients from reporting complaints online until using the complaints procedure!


To get round this one unhappy client posted his review using a nom de plume - bringing an assertion from them they could "conclusively prove" that trust pilot had allowed an imposter to post there. (Subsequently the poster did prove his bona fides!)


Most businesses are happy to have online reviews, and use media to deal with complaints thereby showing they take complaints seriously - though not this one!

bergkamp

logician wrote: »

"Very strange" response back from you Quentin, given I made a reasonable comment to you was the basis of your comment on "known facts", "guesswork" or "supposition."



Why does anyone need more info before posting on a thread? Surely that is the idea of a forum for people to comment on threads and posts?

As you are online logician, could you please clarify your statement here?

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5748204

from this thread;

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5748204

Coupon-mad

Quentin wrote: »

The problem for anyone consulting review sites (or forums) to check them out is that they (try to) gag their clients from reporting complaints online until using the complaints procedure!

To get round this one unhappy client posted his review using a nom de plume - bringing an assertion from them they could "conclusively prove" that trust pilot had allowed an imposter to post there. (Subsequently the poster did prove his bona fides!)

Most businesses are happy to have online reviews, and use media to deal with complaints thereby showing they take complaints seriously - though not this one!

Yes I expect everyone has seen that page on Trust Pilot, although I won't be the person to link it.

Disappointing...what can I say? So I won't.

The person who posted needs to come back here to the thread, and newbies like that person need to be aware not to reply to (or worry about) private messages here on this forum, and report to MSE any such pm.

Keep it on a thread and we can help.

beamerguy

WOW, just been reading on Trust Pilot

How disgusting, that must be a big warning
to people

Trading Standards must investigate