We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Disputing Claim!
Comments
-
Strider590 wrote: »Your trying to pick apart something that remains a valid point, why?
Could have happened in British Summer Time.
It's only a valid argument if you've jumped to the right conclusion.
At the minute your logic is on a par with your grammar. Sub standard.0 -
Franz_Ferdinand wrote: »Could have happened in British Summer Time.
It's only a valid argument if you've jumped to the right conclusion.
At the minute your logic is on a par with your grammar. Sub standard.
See we're back at ad-hominem again, trying to drive the discussion off track AND now using grammar as a way to discredit a perfectly valid point.“I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”
<><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/0 -
Strider590 wrote: »See we're back at ad-hominem again, trying to drive the discussion off track AND now using grammar as a way to discredit a perfectly valid point.
You're the one who jumped to a conclusion and decided it's fact.
Show us where it's definitely a near side door damaged, where the OP had their headlights on and that it happened when lights on vehicles were required.
You've already decided what's happened by filling in your own blanks.0 -
Franz_Ferdinand wrote: »You're the one who jumped to a conclusion and decided it's fact.
Show us where it's definitely a near side door damaged, where the OP had their headlights on and that it happened when lights on vehicles were required.
You've already decided what's happened by filling in your own blanks.
And so the OP should clarify, I don't recall asking you to play Warrior McKeyboard face and all your doing is derailing this thread.“I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”
<><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/0 -
Strider590 wrote: »And so the OP should clarify, I don't recall asking you to play Warrior McKeyboard face and all your doing is derailing this thread.
You've already done that yourself. Filled in the blanks and decided the outcome. Well done.0 -
Franz_Ferdinand wrote: »You're the one who jumped to a conclusion and decided it's fact.
Show us where it's definitely a near side door damaged, where the OP had their headlights on and that it happened when lights on vehicles were required.
You've already decided what's happened by filling in your own blanks.
Sounds like some police officers
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards