We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

House of Fraser fined for misleading customers last Christmas

House of Fraser has been fined £40,000 for misleading Christmas shoppers last year into believing they were getting a bigger bargain on sale items than they actually were...
Read the full story:
'House of Fraser fined for misleading customers last Christmas'
OfficialStamp.gif
Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.

Comments

  • DoaM
    DoaM Posts: 11,863 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Does this mean just about every other high street outlet is now going to be investigated and fined? They ALL do this.
  • donnac2558
    donnac2558 Posts: 3,642 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Is the the famous 50% in very large letters, and it very tiny letters up to? They all do it.
  • POPPYOSCAR
    POPPYOSCAR Posts: 14,902 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    donnac2558 wrote: »
    Is the the famous 50% in very large letters, and it very tiny letters up to? They all do it.

    No it would seem they were showing a discount on a price that was never actually charged rather than the price it had actually been up for sale for.
  • DoaM
    DoaM Posts: 11,863 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    That's not how I read it ... I read it as that they had charged that price previously, but had been charging lower prices more recently yet hadn't indicated THOSE prices.
  • Bogalot
    Bogalot Posts: 1,102 Forumite
    DoaM wrote: »
    That's not how I read it ... I read it as that they had charged that price previously, but had been charging lower prices more recently yet hadn't indicated THOSE prices.

    This is the one. They were showing RRP and the "sale" price, but failed to state they had previously sold the item at prices in between the two (as well as the RRP).
  • takman
    takman Posts: 3,876 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    That's why you should always buy items based on if you think the item is worth the price being charged (based on experience and research). Buying an item just because it had a certain percentage of discount is just ridiculous!.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.