We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Completion delay - liability for costs
Options
Comments
-
mrschaucer wrote: »Presumably your buyer's funds were not in your (sol's) account in time, so your contract with them could not complete. Consequently this lack of funds meant you could not complete on your onward purchase. Yes, in theory you could have given your buyers a licence to occupy your house until they sorted themselves out but why would this be a duty you "have" to do? It would mean your vendor also "having to" let you into their house under licence and so on up the chain. As you say, it only takes one person to refuse and SOMEONE in the chain gets to sleep on a friend's couch/run up hotel bills etc until the person at the bottom gets his act together. This surely can't be a legal requirement - just doesn't make sense - these new costs would only get passed down the chain again to the bottom? Please come back and tell us what your solicitor says.
Two families (mine and our vendors) ended up 'homeless' for a night because of this and were fortunately able to avoid running up hotel bills (our solicitors did just say "book a hotel and have a meal" at the time). So the bills could have been higher than they actually are. On the day of failed completion, the solicitor was adamant that liability for all extra costs would be with the bottom of the chain.
I will post back what the solicitor says :beer:0 -
Yes please do. It would be interesting for people to see just what the legal requirements are to "mitigate" losses under those circumstances.0
-
mrschaucer wrote: »Yes please do. It would be interesting for people to see just what the legal requirements are to "mitigate" losses under those circumstances.0
-
Did you actually incur any costs then, as you've said you didn't stay in a hotel?0
-
Did you actually incur any costs then, as you've said you didn't stay in a hotel?
We incurred miscellaneous costs too, which the solicitors said to claim for (e.g. buying emergency clothing, food, other personal items which were taken into storage with no access), but we have not sought to claim these back.0 -
-
I wonder if anyone could give a legal opinion on who is liable for costs in these circumstances.
Buyer A purchases house from Buyer B, who is purchasing from Buyer C.
Exchange of contracts takes place two weeks before completion.
Delays ensue on completion day, due to A's funds not reaching B's solicitors account by the deadline (15.30). Extra costs are incurred (e.g. removals/storage/interest) by the chain.
Confirmation that A was indeed responsible for B's and C's costs. B (us) and C (our vendors) received cheques refunding our costs a few weeks back.
It was a long hard fight with A's solicitors stalling each time, but got there in the end without having to go through the courts.
My suspicion (based on verbal conversation) is that the solicitors have paid rather than their clients, but that is speculative.
Thanks all for the positive advice on this thread, it definitely helped with sticking to our guns.0 -
Glad it's been sorted - but 5 months wait!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards