We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Unmanaged Leasehold
Options

super9tv
Posts: 5 Forumite
Hello! I am currently near completing on a ground floor victorian terraced house in London.
It is a leasehold, but having gotten the vendors lease documents back it appears that it is not managed (i.e. we're responsible for any repairs and upkeep).
I'm trying to get more information from my solicitor at the moment, as my concern is that what are the legal aspects of this sharing. There is another flat in the building (1st floor) so for example on something like getting guttering replaced, what aspects bind the 1st floor flat owner to paying half?
Likewise, if the roof caves in, I presume we are also liable for 50% of the cost of repair. There is building insurance in place of course.
Any advice or previous experience much appreciated!
It is a leasehold, but having gotten the vendors lease documents back it appears that it is not managed (i.e. we're responsible for any repairs and upkeep).
I'm trying to get more information from my solicitor at the moment, as my concern is that what are the legal aspects of this sharing. There is another flat in the building (1st floor) so for example on something like getting guttering replaced, what aspects bind the 1st floor flat owner to paying half?
Likewise, if the roof caves in, I presume we are also liable for 50% of the cost of repair. There is building insurance in place of course.
Any advice or previous experience much appreciated!
0
Comments
-
The lease will specify what the leaseholder is responsible for maintaining, and what the freeholder is responsible for maintaining.
It will also specify how the freeholders maintenance costs are allocated to leaseholders (e.g. 50% each).
The lease is a binding agreement.
So a typical lease might say the roof is the responsibility of the freeholder, and maintenance costs are 50% to each leaseholder.
So if the roof starts leaking, the freeholder has to repair it and charge the leaseholders.
BUT... freeholders and leaseholders sometimes voluntarily agree to other arrangements. e.g. The roof is leaking, so the leaseholders sort out the repairs and the allocation of costs between them. (and the freeholder doesn't get involved.)0 -
Thanks Edddy, I will go over the lease document with a fine toothed comb again.
However... pretty sure there was nothing pertaining to the split of the bills between parties, and that's what was upsetting my solicitor.
Guess that's a big 'avoid' if it's the case?0 -
However... pretty sure there was nothing pertaining to the split of the bills between parties, and that's what was upsetting my solicitor.
In that case, you can probably apply to a property tribunal to get the lease varied:4.1 Variation of single leases (flats)
Any party to a long lease of a flat may make an application for it to be varied. The grounds for the application to the Tribunal to vary a single lease are that the terms of the lease fail to make satisfactory provision in certain areas. These are:- for the repair and maintenance of the flat, or the building, or land or buildings let to the leaseholders or over which they have rights;
- for the computation of the service charges in terms of the proportion of the charge payable by each flat in relation to the whole building, if the individual proportions add up to more or less than 100%
See: https://www.lease-advice.org/advice-guide/application-to-the-first-tier-tribunal-property-chamber-2/
BUT... I would only go down that route if you enjoy a challenge, you've taken some legal advice (a conveyancing solicitor may not be experienced in this area), and the flat is sufficiently cheap to make this hassle worth it.
Having said that, check the lease in detail. It would be very unusual to say nothing about maintenance. (Some leases deal with this by saying the upstairs flat is responsible for the roof, the downstairs flat is responsible for the foundations etc.)0 - for the repair and maintenance of the flat, or the building, or land or buildings let to the leaseholders or over which they have rights;
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards